1944 The Longest Days

Audience Reviews

View All (5) audience reviews

Peter K I have never seen anything this bad. This includes college film projects. I never realized such poor acting existed in the UK. Ripoff of Cornelius Ryan's title is shameful. Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 04/26/25 Full Review Mutack K This is awful. Almost like a School play with a budget. Acting as bad within 20 mins I gave up. AVOID! Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 04/18/25 Full Review Roy C This is quite possibly the worst film I have ever seen. Absolutely no plot, English actors trying to put on American accents and failing, appalling acting and a 'war' soundtrack that plays in the background on a continuous loop, as you don't actually see any 'war'. It also looked like it was shot in a nearby woods to save the very small budget. How this was released is a huge mystery. Truly dreadful Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 04/09/25 Full Review kb w Abysmal. Awful. A waste of time. No plot. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 04/05/25 Full Review Bonn G 1944 The Longest Days, a film Fire In The Hole is associated with, is perhaps the worst, most pathetic WWII film EVER MADE. It's steaming now and it's not worth 10 cents. Please don't waste $4.99 on it. Go buy a cup of coffee. You'll get much more enjoyment with that. EVEN IF YOU HATE COFFEE! A terrible film about those who gave their lives for so many freedoms. What an embarrassment. Just bad acting, no plot, no character development, no mission, and NO GOOD. It's shameful. And it's 71 minutes. I'm real surprised it lasted that long. The film goes nowhere, offers endless needless scenes and is such a waste of time. To sum it up, it just simply SUCKS! Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 03/31/25 Full Review Read all reviews

1944 The Longest Days

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now