A Chump at Oxford

Audience Reviews

View All (53) audience reviews

Matt S How this film got an 84% positive rating is beyond me. What a snooze fest. This hour long film felt like 4 hrs. It had barely any laughs. Ugh. Maybe not THE WORST Laurel & Hardy feature but a stinker all the same. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 05/25/25 Full Review Denny S "A Chump At Oxford" (1940) was the second to last Hal Roach produced Laurel and Hardy feature before they were thrown on the scrap heap at 20th Century Fox. What makes this film special is that we see Stan Laurel (due to a bump on the head) transformed into the brilliant Lord Paddington. It is a treat to see Stan's acting chops as he plays this part with great flourish and intelligence, completely different from his "Stanley" character. That alone, makes this film a worthy view. Rated 4.5/5 Stars •  Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars 07/01/24 Full Review Edoardo C probably my most favorite movie of the couple Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 06/12/23 Full Review deke p 1939! The film credits said this was produced in 1939 not 1940. & A credit also said that Peter Cushing was in the cast. Enjoyable. Oxford is a different atmosphere than usual for this Comedy couple. never heard of Nor saw before on the movie channel 13.3 Early Saturday morning January 22, 2022 Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 03/30/23 Full Review Audience Member Far from their best work - very uneven, overlong and with some rather forced jokes/slapstick that we've seen served up far better in their earlier shorts. Still quite entertaining but they're looking rather tired, as is the script. Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 02/23/23 Full Review Audience Member Disappointing. It looks old-fashioned, especially as I had noticed the date of 1939 in the opening credits. It looked more old-fashioned than Will Hay in 1939. This was wartime (albeit not in the USA yet), and O&H were repeating their schtick from the early 1930s? Later I read that their partnership really only lasted from 1927-1940. I think it lasted a few years longer than that, but once the war kicked in for real, it diffused and dissolved them. A chump at Oxford has a 20-minute pre-eamble, during which I wondered if the title was as random as a Marx brothers title (but then half of every Harold Lloyd movie is preamble), but no - they go to Oxford, BUT then they spend a whole 15 minutes stuck in a maze! One is tempted to wonder if that was symbolic. There's a great scene in the maze where Stan wonders if he has three hands, but that's about all the content in the scene - in fact it's not a scene it's a whole act. It got a bit better after that, although there were no scenes of their studying, just a curious back-story about Stan being an English Lord (in reality - no kidding) but the film as a whole felt pretty old to me. Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 01/29/23 Full Review Read all reviews

A Chump at Oxford

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now