Rebecca

Audience Reviews

View All (1000+) audience reviews

Lars N Nice atmosphere and character work, but the movie is s ower than need be, and the end falls a bit flat Rated 2.5/5 Stars •  Rated 2.5 out of 5 stars 03/01/25 Full Review Tricia D This movie was fantastic from beginning to end. I was on the edge of my seat the entire time! The entire cast was wonderful, definitely a must see movie! Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 02/12/25 Full Review William B Awesome film. Unexpected ending. Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 11/22/24 Full Review NiB Y This is a perfect movie and should've swept the Oscar that year, but the Academy definetly has some sort of bias against Hitchcock. The story is absolute perfect and even better than the book; the acting is absolute immaculate on literally all sides; the pacing is perfect and you won't even realize this movie is a whole 130 minutes due to how engaging it is! Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 08/25/24 Full Review Kevin L The storyline save this one. Going back this far with movies is often a roll of the dice for me. I try to be objective and keep in mind the context of the writing, directing, acting, and effects of the time. But so often I find the acting so wooden and unrealistic. I found it in "Rebecca", too. Olivier is fine as de Winter, though the character goes back & forth from being a charismatic, strong figure, to being a flaky weakling. Fontaine does good work at times, then goes into that contrived, exaggerated stance, going whole sequences saying nothing with her mouth slack and agape. I guess that's her way of showing terror and confusion. Seemed almost hokey. And that Mrs. Danvers, she's a real hoot, huh? Like Frau Bl眉cher without the charm. Anderson was far from the terrifiying figure she's made out to be. Like Phil Burbank in " The Power of the Dog". Hitchcock did what he could with the tools and tech of his time. The movie works overall, but again, it's the writing that wins. But the basic storyline is better than the dialogue, which is good in exposition and creating & maintaining characters. But then there's the lame romantic lines between the leads. Then there's the strings. The score is painfully bad, imo. Those strings coming in nearly took me out of the movie. Such an unnecessary contrivance. Still, I was happy with the ending and general wrap-up. So all in all, I've give it 3.3 stars Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 08/07/24 Full Review Jeff M This film is the only Hitchcock movie to win the Best Picture Oscar. He never won the Academy Award for Best Director. Interestingly, while overall another terrific achievement, this one didn't grab me as much as some of his later offerings. Although there's suspense here, it feels more like soap opera at times. And this isn't necessarily the fault of Olivier's performance, but every time he is onscreen I can't help but think of Harvey Korman on "The Carol Burnett Show" - Korman did a character that is an obvious impersonation of Lord Olivier here. At over two hours, the movie drags a bit in the middle, but it definitely picks up steam and the last 45 minutes get better and better. Fontaine is superb, and Anderson is one of the creepier supporting characters in recent memory. Hitchcock is a rare breed - I've become very nit-picky when it comes to his movies because of the brilliance I've seen on several occasions. And even though I found faults here, faulty Hitchcock is better than most moviemakers doing their career bests! Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 01/26/24 Full Review Read all reviews

Rebecca

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW