Abel Ferrara is a weird character, yet there is no denying him as one of the more raw directors in the underground independent world of cinema. This is one of his weaker efforts (as many have been since the mid-90s onward). Only watch if you are aware of the history of the Chelsea Hotel or care about the characters....otherwise you'll just be watching a burnout try his hand in haphazardly creating a documentary that is really nothing more than a sloppy homage to a once seedy but historically important piece of culture that was snuffed out by greed and the holy grail of gentrification.

I would prefer a much better doc but I love the theme (Chelsea hotel) so I give it an extra star.

Didn't learn much about the hotel, but sad to see the end of an era when creative types could live in a supportive environment. I especially liked Stanley Bard's approach with people. When Ethan Hawke's marriage was on the rocks and asked to stay at the hotel, Stanely refused to take any money and said, "you can stay here for a month, rent free until you get back together with your wife." Wish there were more of those stories.

Throughout his stewardship of the venerable Chelsea Hotel, Stanley Bard aimed to encourage artists by either charging them cheap rents or deferring their rents but new management aims to run the hotel like a business, going so far as to evict some of its tenants. With his frustrating documentary "Chelsea on the Rocks," feature filmmaker Abel Ferrara aims to capture this end of an era while also proving that making a documentary is not as easy as it looks. First, the movie is unfortunately steeped in hazy nostalgia, even with the hotel's worst moments like the deaths of Nancy Spungen and Sid Vicious, here recreated with a little help from Giancarlo Esposito and Adam Goldberg which as always welcome as they are also ruin the illusion. For the most part, the movie tends not to otherwise identify its less famous subjects and it would have been nice to get to know some of them. Yes, we all know who Ethan Hawke is and the conversation between Stanley Bard and former tenant Milos Forman is fun to watch. That's a part of the anecdotal style of the film which ignores the historical details behind the hotel(except for a plaque). And bringing up 9/11 is not terribly relevant but it does lead to my favorite line in the movie about how it reinforced New Yorkers' willingness to stay.

Chelsea on the Rocks is a film that sounds like it should be an interesting and worthwhile film. Sadly, Abel Ferrara takes a setting and completely makes a mess of it. The film is so unfocused and unclear, that it ends up being story after story, in no particular order. It's unorganized to say the least. We, at times don't know who's talking or what in the fuck they are talking about. Unless, you recognized the person talking, good luck knowing who they are. There's no writing at the bottom telling us who they are. It's just endless "interviews" with people speaking about their personal experiences with the hotel. At one minute we will be hearing about the night of Sid and Nancy. The next minute, we hear about a guy having a stroke. Then we hear about the owner questioning a kid. Then about all the dealers. Then about ghosts. Alright a lot of shit happened in the hotel, I get it. Pick a fucking subject and go from there. I was extremely excited to watch this movie, but that initial excitement was gone after the first 15 minutes. For awhile, I thought the pointless interviews were just introductory stuff that Ferrara would dive deeper into later. Nope. He had no intention on letting the viewer have any idea on what was going on. He also had no intention on teaching us anything about the hotel. But worst, he had no intention on making a documentary. This is more like a lazy collage of video. Pointless. I respect Ferrara as a filmmaker. He's made some worthwhile movies in his career, but I have absolutely no idea what he was doing here. He's got an endless amount of people talking about their experiences, from Ethan Hawke to Milos Forman, with no clear idea on where he wants the movie to go or what he wants to say about it. An interesting subject is completely slaughtered here, and is instead made into a boring stream of consciousness.

Caòtic (com el director i la història que amaga, clar).

<a></a> <img src="http://s3.amazonaws.com/auteurs_production/stills/7070/original.jpg?1289445599" width="240" border="0" />

Vista en el Festival de Cine de Mar Del Plata. Muy dinàmico documental de ABEL FERRARA. Narra parte de la historia del hotel que albergò a personalidades como BURROUGHS, SID & NANCY, JOPLIN, MILOS FORMAN, DYLAN, ETHAN HAWKE, CRUMB, WARHOL y el mismo FERRARA. Un hotel muy particular, cuna de artistas plàsticos, sin dinero, albergados sin contratos, y el dilema actual del cambio de firma, y los desalojos recientes. El film plantea con fluidez el panorama de lo que ha sido la experiencia de vivir en dicho hotel, muy bohemio, donde artistas abonaban con sus obras el alquiler, debiendo cuantiosos meses, pero, conformando una especie de comunidad o familia con el correr de los años. La charla con MILOS FORMAN es la màs graciosa e increible, uno no sabe si èste està tomàndonos el pelo o contando verdades por lo ridìculas que pueden resultar. 9/10

Un hotel con personalidad propia, un albergue para artistas y las leyendas que esto trae, el documental patina varias veces y por momentos carece de sentido, no define que quiere contar exactamente, algunas caras conocidas prestan su testimonio (sobre su estadia y llegada) y unos momentos de ficcion recrean momentos historicos en la escena de la musica alla por los 70s, se baja.

Another type of documentary could have been made about this place but it would have never been close to Ferrara's version. There is the mildly rough editing and the re-enactments (with a Sid Vicious that doesn't look like Sid Vicious ) that we could have done without, but all in all it was interesting. More could have been said about this iconic place in NY but it was enough to get the whole idea of what it stands for. Priceless part with a deconstructed Milos Forman that is just awesome to watch.

Wow! Excelente documental... y algo extraño saber que tampoco el gran pais del norte sabe preservar su historia... we are not alone! Shame on all of us!

As a documentary it's very unorthodox and perhaps a bit confusing. Abel Ferrara has a weird habit of interrupting the interviewees with his own drunken ramblings. The Vietman story included was very touching though.

Oh this is so poor. The glorification of people doing drugs just bugs me, and I'm one who is fascinated by portraits of addicts ("Candy", "Spun" etc.)! It is very uneven and probably could have used a little more editing, perhaps the director's vision was for it to be uneven and aspiring to make the movie resemble a delerium but the end result is not satifactory. On the up hand there are a few interesting stories told here and especially the part where Milos Forman talks about a party and the waterfalls down the stairs is entertaining as well as Ethan Hawke's parts are (great impression on that Arthur Miller-Marilyn Monroe thing!). One thing that also struck me watching this, is how there doesn't seem to be many women living at the Chealsea. It is in deed a mans world and the film somewhat ends up focusing on these big men that have unbelievable stories to tell. (Some while obviously intoxicated). So what about the rating then? The film stirs up some emotions and is entertaining but not like other [better] documentaries, so I'll have to leave it with two and a half poor stars. I'd advice one who is extremely interested in the Chelsea to see it, but if you know nothing about the hotel, don't waste your time.

More for the sheer history than the actual movie itself.

onları bu otele çeken neydi???

an interesting pov...