Rotten Tomatoes
Cancel Movies Tv shows

The Gospel According to St. Matthew

Play trailer Poster for The Gospel According to St. Matthew Released Sep 4, 1964 2h 16m History Drama Biography Play Trailer Watchlist
Watchlist Tomatometer Popcornmeter
89% Tomatometer 36 Reviews 86% Popcornmeter 2,500+ Ratings
Pier Paolo Pasolini's Biblical drama follows the life of Jesus Christ (Enrique Irazoqui) as depicted in the Gospel of Matthew from the New Testament. Much of the dialogue in the Italian film hews closely to the text, which focuses on the teachings of Jesus, including his parables, and on their revolutionary nature. As Jesus travels along the coast of the Sea of Galilee, he gradually gathers more followers, leading him into direct conflict with the authorities.
Watch on Fandango at Home Buy Now

Where to Watch

The Gospel According to St. Matthew

The Gospel According to St. Matthew

What to Know

Critics Consensus

The Gospel According to St. Matthew forgoes the pageantry of biblical epics in favor of a naturalistic retelling of the Christ story, achieving a respectful if not reverent interpretation with political verve.

Read Critics Reviews

Critics Reviews

View All (36) Critics Reviews
Derek Malcolm London Evening Standard Superb in every way, and possibly the film-maker's best. Rated: 5/5 Mar 1, 2013 Full Review Peter Bradshaw Guardian A fierce magnesium flame of a movie. Rated: 5/5 Feb 28, 2013 Full Review David Jenkins Little White Lies Definitely one for multiple viewings, and arguably up there with Pasolini's best. Rated: 5/5 Mar 8, 2012 Full Review Yasser Medina Cinefilia With a refined aesthetic, Pasolini frames an ascetic portrait of Christ's journey in a neorealist style, but unfortunately, his approach to the biblical text is didactic. [Full review in Spanish] Rated: 6/10 Apr 13, 2025 Full Review Scott Nye Battleship Pretension Pasolini frequently uses those who push themselves to the margins of society to expose our collective and individual weaknesses, and our determination to maintain the image of order. Jun 29, 2023 Full Review Robin Holabird Robin Holabird Pasolini pay[s] attention to contrasts of light, and also focuses on faces and reactions to cruel deeds. Aug 11, 2021 Full Review Read all reviews

Audience Reviews

View All (175) audience reviews
Alec B It's interesting to compare this to the biblical epics getting cranked out by Hollywood at the same time. Those movies were massive in scope, incredibly long, overwrought, and excessively sentimental while Pasolini's vision is intimate, comparatively short, and more emotionally subdued. Can you guess which was the more successful? Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars 04/13/25 Full Review Vitor O Arguably the best religious epic from the 60's, this picture (made by an atheist and marxist Pasolini) is beautiful, elegant, and stripped from all the nonsense and hokum characteristic from the Holywoodian versions from that era. Rated 4 out of 5 stars 03/15/25 Full Review Hilary L Terrible movie. The acting is bad, the depiction of Jesus Christ is by far the worst I've seen in my life. Rated 1 out of 5 stars 04/03/24 Full Review Nawt W How ironic that one of the most faithful depictions of Jesus' life is put on film by a gay, Marxist atheist. Showing Matthew 1–28 in the most unostentatious, raw way possible. Everything is under the rule of realism, starting with the unkempt unibrow of first-time actor Enrique Irazoqui, who plays the most intimidating Jesus yet. His deadpan expression of determination and his sudden splashes of temper really paint a vivid picture of a preacher. As is customary with neorealism, non-professional actors are used, and this Bible story is no exception. The muddy outskirts of Judea clash with anachronistic Roman armor that is clearly not from this age or maybe the Roman era at all. The movie has one Odetta song play on repeat, and since this is an Italian movie, the mandatory dub is mostly out of sync. Rated 4 out of 5 stars 01/16/23 Full Review William L Are the massive hats worn by the priests considered historically accurate? That's got to be a weight on the neck. Hope Jerusalem had a solid chiropractor. Bringing together neorealist aesthetic and production quality with dialogue that pulls only from translations of Biblical accounts from Jesus' life, The Gospel According to Matthew was a radical political statement in its day but has aged into one of he better takes on its subject matter in film. Gone are blinding lights and distracting depictions of some form of holy 'power' (and not just because the budget was too low to allow them). Pasolini was focused on depicting Christ as the revolutionary and the antagonist of convention, focusing on the rebellion against corrupt interpretations of doctrine and combating his adversaries with logic and conviction rather than outright divinity (the director apparently had misgivings about including as many of the miracles as he did). The film shows a particular appreciation for Christian doctrine, allowing the poetic nature of the text and timeless qualities to the canon descriptions of Jesus' life to carry the story; these aspects are often underappreciated due to just how well-known the content is, if nothing else. Surprisingly diverse soundtrack, as well. I still never quite got over the story of the Woman with the Ointment, a parable that is in three of the four Gospels and one that has implications for many of the problems that some have had with the Church in the past two millennia - the extravagance of worship, and the problem of money in faith when the less fortunate still exist. A woman anoints Jesus with valuable oil, which Jesus justifies by clarifying that his death is forthcoming; the disciples then (in accordance with Jesus' teachings of good works) ask why the oil was not sold for the benefit of the poor; Jesus than says that "the poor will always be with you." But so will Jesus, in the form of the Spirit, and isn't admitting that the poor will always exist an acceptance of the ultimate insufficiency of charity in the mortal world? To me, it felt implied that the worship of Christ and the pursuit of good works were supposed to be totally intertwined, but this lone story has always seemed to contradict it. (3.5/5) Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 06/27/21 Full Review S R 1001 movies to see before you die. I didn't feel this added to my understanding of the Gospels. Although it was simple and straightforward, it wasn't something that impacted me. YouTube is saw it. Vatican 100 list. Rated 2.5 out of 5 stars 08/30/23 Full Review Read all reviews
The Gospel According to St. Matthew

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW
Cromwell 33% 70% Cromwell Watchlist Gandhi 89% 92% Gandhi Watchlist TRAILER for Gandhi Barabbas 89% 67% Barabbas Watchlist The Last Emperor 86% 88% The Last Emperor Watchlist Lawrence of Arabia 93% 93% Lawrence of Arabia Watchlist TRAILER for Lawrence of Arabia Discover more movies and 온라인카지노추천 shows. View More

Movie Info

Synopsis Pier Paolo Pasolini's Biblical drama follows the life of Jesus Christ (Enrique Irazoqui) as depicted in the Gospel of Matthew from the New Testament. Much of the dialogue in the Italian film hews closely to the text, which focuses on the teachings of Jesus, including his parables, and on their revolutionary nature. As Jesus travels along the coast of the Sea of Galilee, he gradually gathers more followers, leading him into direct conflict with the authorities.
Director
Pier Paolo Pasolini
Producer
Alfredo Bini
Screenwriter
Pier Paolo Pasolini
Distributor
Water Bearer Films, Continental Distributing Inc.
Production Co
Arco Films
Genre
History, Drama, Biography
Original Language
Italian
Release Date (Theaters)
Sep 4, 1964, Original
Release Date (Streaming)
Sep 1, 2012
Runtime
2h 16m
Sound Mix
Mono
Most Popular at Home Now