I don't normally write reviews, but this movie has compelled me to do so. It has a pretty good Popcorn rating here, but I just don't see why. This movie was absolutely ruined by the main character played by Emily Blunt. She was a good enough actress, but the character itself was so annoying that the movie is simply awful. The character basically whines, cries, and acts morally superior to everyone throughout the movie. At various points in the movie, other characters explain to her that the operation she is involved in is not going to be "by the book" and if she is not ok with that she should leave. Yet she insists on sticking around and whining about how things are not being done according to her idea of what is right. I would be ok with that if she somehow learned from her experiences and grew as a character somehow, but basically at the end of the movie, she is in the exact same place as where she started. What is the point? Another really annoying thing about the character is that she makes the exact wrong decision at every point where she has an opportunity to do so. I like movies with clever characters who are smart. She is not smart or clever. For example, she discovers that a guy she is making out with might be involved in money laundering. Aside from the questionable decision to bring a guy she just met back to her house without even knowing him even a little bit, she could have just said "Excuse me, I have to go to the bathroom," and then gotten out to safety. Instead, she gets all freaked out and the dude figures out she is on to him right away. What an idiot move. She also does not seem to be very well cast. We are supposed to believe that she is a great field agent, but she loses every single fight she is in throughout the entire movie as if she has never had any training, and she is built like a twig with barely enough muscles to walk, much less fight a bad guy. Is there no beefier woman in all of Hollywood? If she had not been the central character in the movie, this might not have been a problem, but as it is, it is just always in your face the entire time, and I just found myself asking "Why?" a lot. "Why did she do that?" "Why doesn't she just leave?" etc. Do yourself a favor and watch some other action movie tonight.

Filled with excellent performances and direction.

Incredibly intense, and also sad. While Alejandro was a riveting character, Blunt's Kate seemed too much a symbolic trope as the lone, naiive physically slight female providing the moral compass of the events. A worthy watch, though.

I think this does one thing really well. It's the title's ability to MAINTAIN intrigue, without wasting or faltering, the fatal flaw of nearly all similar titles. Otherwise rather uninventive, and almost certainly nothing you haven't seen before in that regard. Big points for structure and execution most acutely.

Sicario" (2025) is a film that impresses with its strong visual presentation, particularly its cinematography, but ultimately falls short of delivering a truly compelling narrative. While the film creates a tense and atmospheric experience, its story struggles to fully engage the viewer. The film's strongest asset is its cinematography. The visuals are striking and impactful, effectively capturing the gritty realism and tension of the film's subject matter. The use of lighting, camera angles, and composition contributes significantly to the film's overall mood and atmosphere. However, the film's narrative struggles to maintain a strong grip on the audience. The plot feels somewhat thin and lacks the depth and complexity needed to fully invest viewers in the characters and their motivations. The pacing can be uneven, with moments of intense action interspersed with slower, less engaging scenes. The performances are adequate, but the characters are often underdeveloped, making it difficult to form a strong emotional connection with them. The dialogue, while functional, lacks the sharp wit and memorable lines that could elevate the film's impact. While "Sicario" (2025) offers a visually impressive cinematic experience, its narrative shortcomings prevent it from being a truly satisfying film. Its strong cinematography and atmospheric visuals are commendable, but the lack of a compelling story and engaging characters ultimately leaves the viewer wanting more.

I enjoyed this movie. Intriguing until the very end.

Great action film with a lot of unpredictable moments. 94%

Fantastic movie! Easily one of my favorite movies to date and has been since viewing it in theaters right after it came out.

Franchement bien aimé ce film qui est plus qu'un simple film policier suspense etc etc, il prend au tripes et la real est vraiment cool. Je m'attendais à un énième film policier banal mais c'est sincèrement + que ça !

Still the benchmark Sicario. Gripping, fast paced, to the point. Del Toro fits this character like a glove, Emily Blunt and Josh Brolin shines in character, well the whole cast excels. Well assembled and well executed.

For thriller fans, this is one you can't miss. Binicio's gaze alone tells you the acting talent he's made of. The entire film demonstrates the quality of its craft from start to finish.

Sicario is a slow-burning, intense thriller that delivers on tension but falls a bit short when it comes to depth. The story follows an idealistic FBI agent thrown into the brutal world of cartel warfare, where the lines between right and wrong blur fast. The setup is great, and the film builds tension well, but the lack of depth in the cartel, who are the driving force behind the protagonist’s struggles, makes it hard to fully invest in the stakes. While some might appreciate the detached, shadowy approach to the villains, it left me feeling disconnected from the mission itself. Denis Villeneuve’s direction is top-notch, making every scene feel deliberate and atmospheric. The cinematography, led by Roger Deakins, is absolutely stunning, using light, shadow, and vast landscapes to create a haunting visual experience. The action sequences are raw and realistic, with a standout border crossing scene that might be one of the best in modern thrillers. The script, while solid in terms of structure, doesn’t fully flesh out the antagonists, making the conflict feel one-sided. The performances carry the film, with Emily Blunt doing a great job portraying a character out of her depth, even if her arc feels frustrating at times. Benicio del Toro is the real standout, bringing a cold, quiet intensity that dominates every scene he’s in. Josh Brolin nails his role as the laid-back but ruthless government operative, adding just the right amount of charisma. The score, composed by Jóhann Jóhannsson, is heavy and ominous, perfectly complementing the film’s mood. Overall, Sicario is technically brilliant, but its lack of depth in key areas holds it back from being truly great, for me, at least.

85% fan rating? Incorrect. This movie is a masterpiece. One of the best by Denis Villaneuve.

Intense drama exposes hypocracies and futilities of the Drug war.

i have few complaints. it dodges around the initial premise that may seem to be pro-cop, pro border control and gives us a subtle cross section of how much chaos is actually happening in the war on drugs, and the impact it can have on communities. my only real issue is just that in the tunnel scene, the walls look extremely fake. they should have either slapped a bunch of dirt on them to hide the paint, or used some kind of concrete or wall covering that would make more sense for the application.

Beautifully sad movie. Denis Villeneuve is really good at those, beautiful, sad movies. I recommend.

“You can’t do this!” Emily Blunt character says to Josh Brolin‘s character towards the end of the movie, why? Because Josh Brolin and his other CIA buddies are going after drug dealers and cartel thugs, EMILY blunt wants to hug and kiss them and give them a Snickers bar. That part became extremely annoying and stupid, it could’ve been a damn good movie

Addictive, gentle and harsh at the same time, I stayed up until 4 a.m. because I could not turn it off. Educational in a way, about when law works and when it doesn't.

I viewed this film last night. Watching Sheridan's 1923 provoked me to view his earlier work and backstory. Many of his character thoughts are things I think about, which creates an emotional alignment for me. I am highly visual. I worked in law enforcement and went to film school. When I view a film, I scan first to see if the actor "fits" the role. Miscasting repels me. I then might watch the entire film, but it requires an expended focus. If the roles assigned are believable, there is a flow. As if I am there. Much more fluid. I call the miscasting afilmative action. Sicario was personal, for me. I worked for the San Diego Police Department. I bumped into Josh Brolin not too long ago at a grocery store. He has presence. Sheridan is riding the top of the world. Read "Hollywood Animal" by Joe Esterhas. Joe said if you have a good product, someone will buy it. Drugs, money, power and breaking the rules. Sicario smokes in these categories. Nice job, Josh. Congratulations, Taylor.

The female lead nearly ruins a great movie. A female would never be put in a role like that in real life and if they were, they would instantly be removed if they acted as she did in this film. Other than that, great film.