I don't get why this is a satire of anything. A bunch of stupid guys try to find attractive women for a beauty contest at a fireman's ball, and there are none to be found. The ball is held in honor of an 86-year-old fireman who may have cancer -- governmental policy forbids doctors to tell patients who have cancer that they have it. A lottery is supposed to be held, but all the gifts are stolen by attendees before that happens. A house next door burns down, and no one does anything about it. Communist governments should be easy to satirize, but if this is a satire, it was lost in translation for this viewer.

The satirical content of The Firemen's Ball is applied lightly. While the story is a metaphor for communism, it can be enjoyed simply as a comedy about inept firemen trying to organise an event that is beyond their competence. Indeed some firemen organisations in Czechoslovakia complained that the film was an attack on their dignity. Events in the film were inspired by a real fireman's ball that Forman and the other screenwriters Ivan Passer and Jaroslav Papoušek had recenty attended. Forman denied setting out to make a film that was an allegory, but he acknowledged that this aspect of the story would come out in the writing, and he made no effort to discourage this interpretation. Here we see the gap between these men's dreams of a dignified send-off to their former chief, and the reality of their abilities to accomplish such an event. The opening credits show dignified group photographs of firemen. The firemen we see in the film are a rough and ready lot with no hint of glamour. Forman employed few professional actors. The people we see are real locals, and even actual firemen. It is clear that the firemen organising the ball want the event to be a success, but their own failings get in the way. A raffle has been arranged. While there are some decent items of food on display, most of the prizes are distinctly grubby. This does not prevent all the guests – and many of the organisers – from stealing as many prizes as they can get their hands on. Then there is the Miss Fireman event. The firemen look wistfully at pictures of a previous beauty contest, where the room is lined a large number of shapely women in bathing suits. Their attempt to repeat this success yields only a small number of contestants who are homely at best. Some were only added due to pressure from other people, including a daughter who looks just like her father, and not in a good way. While the event is taking place, a real fire breaks out. A man's home is burned down as the firemen try to unsuccessfully free their fire engine, which is stuck in the snow. A number of the guests come to watch the flames, and one of the homeowner's rescued tables is used to sell them beer. Attempts by the firemen to comfort the distraught victim are well-meant but inept. Fearing that he might be cold, their response is – to move him closer to the fire that is burning down his home. The parallels with Communism can easily be found. Like the Czech government, the fire officials belong to an organisation that is theoretically well-meaning in terms of helping others, but which is incompetent and corrupt in practice. Many of the characters do not have names, as if they are part of an organisation that offers no humanising identity. The firemen's attempts to raise funds are undermined by kleptocratic actions that remove the means to help others, leaving only inadequate gestures. The houses of the people have symbolically burned down, and all the authorities can do to help is to move them closer to the fire. When one of the firemen is caught trying to return a prize that he stole, his colleagues are only disgusted because he got caught. "The reputation of our Brigade is more important than your stupid honesty." It is easy to imagine a bureaucrat in a totalitarian state saying that about any attempt to highlight its failings. Forman may not have been laying on a heavy-handed attack on Communism, but the allegory is there for all to see. However this has not dated the film. The Firemen's Ball can be enjoyed on a surface level as pure comedy. In any case, regardless of political system, we have all experienced enough official incompetence to see something universal in the film. I wrote a longer appreciation of The Firemen's Ball on my blog page if you would like to read more: https://themoviescreenscene.wordpress.com/2021/02/11/czechs-and-balancing-acts-the-hand-1965-and-the-firemens-ball-1967/

This film was average 🤏

Ever hear of an event where nearly everything goes wrong? with those in authority being somewhat incompetent? well, this is a short film (1 hour 15) where that pretty much is the case. Watching the old men try to work their way around various unforeseen circumstances is amusing in a bumbling and cringe-y way. I believe its intended as a piece of political satire, which makes sense to an extent. Certainly when the fire is discovered outside and the locals rush to get out and see whats going on, its a bit like those in power 'fiddling while Rome burns'. I wouldn't say it entirely comes across as political as such, though there are certain points where you could make political points I guess. Its mildly amusing but not full of big laughs.

The Firemen's Ball is an excellent work of social satire which brough director Milos Forman to international attention. While it would be fair to say that the film lost some of its impact with the collapse of Czechoslovakia's communist government, it will remain resonant as long as official incompetence and corruption exist.

Though it doesn't receive nearly the same level of recognition as some of its Western European counterparts, pre-Soviet Czech film (particularly of those of the Czech New Wave) had some absolutely fantastic jewels before the invasion. A comedic spoof of social conduct and bureaucracy, with particular relevance to the Communist Party that would soon be sending troops in to quash just this sort of criticism, The Fireman's Ball is full of incompetence, lechery, and adherence to strict codes of conduct at the expense of any sort of practical benefit. The firemen find themselves caught up in a web of misfortune and deceit that results in an endless stream of gags, such as the constant theft of their door prizes, the catastrophic disorganization of a beauty contest that devolves into a strange ritualistic exhbition, and incessant deflection of blame for all of it within their own ranks; this ends up distracting them from an actual fire in the town and the devastation of one man's life, to which their response is to ... attempt to collect cash for unspent bills, use the man's unburned furniture to sell drinks, turn his chair away from the fire as to essentially ignore the problem, and then attempt to compensate him with raffle tickets that are now worthless because every prize has been stolen. A top-shelf comedy with social bite that must be considered among Forman's best, even when considering the classics that he directed ater his emigration to the United States. (4/5)

Slight but amusing early Milos Forman comedy, almost plotless and like a Gogol short story directed by Robert Altman. At a small-town village hall a group of middle-aged firemen plan to honour their retiring chief by throwing a large gala, complete with a beauty pageant and raffle. Trouble is, they are hopeless at both. And then there's a real fire. Forman is expert at recording the comedy of minutiae, the looks, the hesitance, the unvarnished chaos of human behaviour, and he elicits terrific performances from his large ensemble of unknown Czech actors.

1001 movies to see before you die. A quirky comedy poking fun at the people in a small town and their firemen's ball. A fascinating time capsule of communist Czechoslovakia. Saw it on TCM.

Its humor is a slow burn, piling up the catastrophes one after another until the whole kit and caboodle goes up in flames. There's a spark here—just a spark, really, a bright hint at the pyrotechnics that will come later in Forman's career—but it's hard to know whether it's of madness or of genius, though it's likely a mixture of the two, the madness of the maddening crowd, the genius of a blossoming subversion. Yet, despite how bright the satire and the humor, I found the film to be somewhat dull, just as its characters and worldview are dim. It is a film that requires patience for the humor to grow, but for me, by the time the set up was paid off, I had grown impatient with the buffoonery and stupidity—though perhaps, to a degree, that is built in to the movie. Whatever political heat this carried in 1967, whatever foreign charm, is lost now, like ashes in the wind, now turned cool into snow.

There's a kind of brutal honesty at the heart of all the madcap antics. Forman clearly sees humans for what they are and no high minded ideals or political systems will every change that.

Follow the farcical misadventures of a small Czech fire dept trying to honor their ailing chairman in Milos Forman's final hometown film chock full of scathing mockery of Soviet society. Big Shocker: this film was permanently banned.

The genuine acting and the humorous situations make this movie really funny to watch. The people in this movie, you can almost make caricatures out of them. They all have such memorable and distinct different faces and personalities. This movie just confirms how great Milos is as a director. How he can make something so simple, have only one film location, and make it so entertaining. I love how everything falls apart towards the end, nothing goes as planned. It was so sad seeing that old man still sitting there at the end and everyone gone. As if everyone had forgotten about him. Pretty damn cynical movie but a great one at that. Very funny movie!

Very interesting early work from Forman and a sly satire on Communism

Despite such accusations, Director Milos Forman rebuffed the claim that his bouncy, packed comedy-of-manners about plans gone awry doubled as a political allegory. I think it does, and brilliantly so.

On of the brightest highlights of director Milos Forman's now-legendary filmography. A film on how people interact with one another.

It's a fun picture, with hilarious pokes at Czech life. It's wonderfully short, and doesn't overreach in any other way either.

http://filmreviewsnsuch.blogspot.com/2015/12/the-firemens-ball.html

It's a fun picture, with hilarious pokes at Czech life. It's wonderfully short, and doesn't overreach in any other way either.

Review In A Nutshell: I know very little of Milos Forman and the films he has created, yes and that includes his well-known projects like One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest and Amadeus. So I came into The Firemen's Ball with no hanging expectations. The Firemen's Ball's plot is about a party celebrating the 86th birthday of the ex-boss of the fire department and throughout, ridiculous things ensue. On its surface, I was able to laugh at the film's satire, but beyond that I was lost. There is clearly some sort of political undertone in its incidents and characters, but due to my sheer ignorance of politics, all the more outside of my own country and generation, I was not able to find myself engaged in Forman's underlying elements. This is a film that would benefit from a rewatch, more appropriately during a time where I have developed enough intelligence and experience in regards to politics and society.

Review In A Nutshell: I know very little of Milos Forman and the films he has created, yes and that includes his well-known projects like One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest and Amadeus. So I came into The Firemen's Ball with no hanging expectations. The Firemen's Ball's plot is about a party celebrating the 86th birthday of the ex-boss of the fire department and throughout, ridiculous things ensue. On its surface, I was able to laugh at the film's satire, but beyond that I was lost. There is clearly some sort of political undertone in its incidents and characters, but due to my sheer ignorance of politics, all the more outside of my own country and generation, I was not able to find myself engaged in Forman's underlying elements. This is a film that would benefit from a rewatch, more appropriately during a time where I have developed enough intelligence and experience in regards to politics and society.