This is an underrated classic spooky film. I saw this when I was eight or 10 and it was perfect. It didn’t have that in your face gore or horror, but the suspense and creepiness is fantastic. I definitely watch it with 1980 movie making in mind, not by today’s standards. The acting and pacing of the movie is perfect, although the end seems to wrap up quickly. But after watching the alternate endings on the DVD, I can see what care they took to create the best ending they could for it.

Someone put the original beginning of this film on YouTube, and merged together all three of the various endings that were filmed into a much more cohesive whole. This version is missing a small bit of characters meeting each other and the acquisition of a puppy whose name figures into part of the "mystery". But if you've seen the film in the version that was released in theaters,(and on DVD) definitely check out the YouTube version, which is "fixes" the odd ending of the theatrical version . I've grown to really love this film. I never found it scary as such, but it's got a wonderful mood and atmosphere that even Lynn Holly Johnson's overly strident OneNote performance cannot ruin. It's a terrific film to show little kids on Halloween to let them be scared with nothing offensive or truly disturbing occurring in the film. I totally enjoy it

Cult classic I’ve watch for over 30 years! Now passing on to my children who absolutely loved it! I had to buy it after they wouldn’t let me return it to the library. Jumps scares and suspense. Clever story not just ghosts and haunted houses. Haven’t seen the remake yet but I love Anjelica Houston so will give it a go. But. Nothing could take me away from this film. I love it when Disney gives us something unexpected and outside the norm of princesses and fairytales. Freaky Friday, Escape from Witch mountain, Candleshoe, Bedknobs and Broomsticks all encompassing the nostalgia of my childhood and love for mystery and adventure. They just don’t make them like this anymore. Even movies like the Wizard of Oz didn’t need all that CGI and still hold up today.

It's far too compromised by studio meddling to work. Release the original cut you cowards!

Not too scary but I enjoyed the concept and the explanation of the weirdness was unexpected.

Scariest movie Disney ever made! Watched it growing up (over and over) and it always gave us the creeps (in the good way). My sister showed it to her friends for dinner night about 2014 and those who hadn't seen it were so scared thst one of them bit another out of fear! Just a few months ago (2022) I watched it with my 13 year old daughter and she got to feel the fear of horror done right. I was tired thst night and every time I closed my eyes I heard "don't make me watch this alone please, please." She loved it! (Maybe a different story if i had fallen asleep and she had to watch it alone?) A true horror classic that stands the test of time. Pro tip. Watch it in the woods on a camping trip!

If you can get past the poor acting, especially the scene with Holly and the man holding the dog at the door - its a mildly entertaining Disney horror flik —

This is one of many forgotten 80s gems that deserve its second life in the cult Disney horror fandom.

A decent Disney thriller that would have benefited with satisfying conclusion than a sub-par twist, that barely makes sense. Not the worst but sort of head scratching nonetheless.

The Watcher in the Woods is one of the first scary movies many people my age watched. After all, it's a squeaky clean horror movie made by Disney. It feels a little dated now, the story is slow, and the acting isn't the greatest, but it's still got some eeriness left in it. I recently showed it to my children and they found it to be creepy as well. It seems there's still some value in watching the Watcher.

More Creepy than Scary this horror might be one of Disney's most curious movies.

Oh so very boring. 'The Watcher in the Woods' isn't necessarily a terrible film, but wow did I feel completely uninterested from (almost) start-to-finish. Dully told plot with a plain cast list. I couldn't, unfortunately, tell you anything I actually found good about this. Lynn-Holly Johnson (Jan), a year prior to her appearance in James Bond, is the standout, but that's only down to a process of elimination to be honest; I found the rest yawnful. They aren't helped by the writing which fails to captivate how supposedly heavy the premise is, it's all basically as it seems - obvious. I should've cared for Mrs. Aylwood (Bette Davis) but I simply didn't feel attached one bit. It is a weird one due to it not, as noted, doing anything massively negative, it's just the fact that the (short) run time is such a chore to get through. Not one I'd recommend.

Disney really struck out this time.

The suspenseful filming make this worth seeing. It does get a little odd for a Disney movie though with the separate dimensions. It does bring back the memories of how I never got through it as a kid.

Wacky and weird, including all three endings.

Disney Pictures once made a horror film. Really! In the early 80's they decided to capitalise on the horror boom and make a scary film for young adults. The Watcher in the Woods was made in 1980. It holds the honour of being possibly the most rented VHS tape of yours truly when he was a young boy (Supergirl was a close second). I saw the film when I was 9 and loved it from the first time I saw it. The film concerns a family renting a large house in the country which is suspiciously being let out at a very low price for some reason (always a red flag in a horror film. If this ever happened to me I'm pretty sure I'd ask about whether an Indian burial ground was beneath the premises in question). Theres one catch though- the rather sinister old woman who owns the property will be living in a room in the huge rambling mansion. Pretty soon strange, bizarre things start to happen. Could there be something which explains this? Is there something that happened in the past that is the cause of these occurrences? Of course there is. This is a horror film, albeit one made by Disney Inc. I watched the film again recently for the first time in years and I'm glad to say that the dark magic the movie held for me as a child hasn't dissipated. There is something about the disquieting goings-on in the movie that feel like ingredients of a classic, quintessentially English and utterly unsettling ghost yarn. Everything points to a girl called Karen and what has happened to her. Her ghostly omnipotent presence is felt in numerous different ways such as the youngest daughter, Ellen (played by Kyle Richards from Halloween) going into a trance and writing Karen's name backwards on a dirty barn window (The Watcher in the Woods came out before The Shining and so it's this film that owns the honour of giving audiences the first glimpse of an unnerving sequence involving a child writing something disturbing backwards). She then gets a new puppy who she calls Nerak (the name she wrote earlier and Karen's name backwards). The older daughter Jan also has her share of visitations from Karen in other disturbing ways. When a window breaks she can suddenly see her in the broken glass wearing white, blindfolded and crying for help. She also sees Karen in a hall of mirrors at her local funfair. This imagery suggests that Karen is trapped somehow between dimensions, as if broken glass and mirrors can see beyond the rational world and into the beyond. The film also suggests that both Jan and Ellen possess some kind of ESP or second sight which is triggered in different situations. In a huge plot reveal, the elderly owner of the property, Mrs Aylwood (played by the very Ms Bette Davis, no less!) also picks up on the fact that Jan reminds her of her daughter Karen who, it is revealed, disappeared decades before in mysterious circumstances. Suddenly Jan knows who the girl is in the visions. But the film also mines into a fear of that particular time that was just starting to gain national attention. That was of the existence of prowlers and perverts who could harm children and young teenagers in a number of different ways. One of the characters in the film is called Tom Colley and it's suggested at one point that he could be the watcher in the woods that the film's title makes reference to. Why is he shown to be watching the two young girls so intently and then ducking out of view so that he isn't noticed? In fact, his appearance and early scenes in the film reminded me of an episode of the children's drama Grange Hill that was brave enough to cover the issue to alert kids and parents like of this phenomenon. Another facet of the story that greatly adds to the film is the storyline as to how Karen went missing. During an eclipse four children (one of whom was Karen) practised an old ritual they had heard about which was something akin to an occult ceremonial rite in which they kinked arms around Karen in a local church not knowing that this childish excursion into the paranormal would have disastrous consequences for her. She is now trapped in a supernatural netherworld or limbo and appears to the newest child occupants of her old house (Jan and Ellen) pleading to be freed. This idea of an ancient ritual also suggests an old English ghost story in much the same way the events and imagery used within The Wicker Man do. But whilst I watched this as a child and thoroughly enjoyed the film, I wasn't to know of the troubled production and reception of the film and how Disney responded to this. The screenplay that was originally written for the film was by the genius Brian Clements who has written many classic British dramas including the brilliant Thriller series. But his version of the screenplay was based too closely to the source novel A Watcher in the Woods by Florence Engel Randall that was way more nuanced that the version of the film that I eventually rented on video. The original novel went to great pains to explain what the actual watcher was and why it was haunting the environs of the mansion and it's adjacent woods. Within the novel the watcher is described as- ''a female alien humanoid-child. She was described to have a pointy chin, an upturned nose and wore a long flowing robe. Fifty years before, her parents had taken her to a ceremonial coming-of-age ritual on their home planet in which she was to view earth, but Karen, during her walk, was too near the portal when it opened and the two changed places. She is here as an observer and communicates with her race through telepathy.'' Whilst this would have been great to read off the page of a novel it would have been hard to depict in a motion picture. It would have required deft adaptation in terms of screenplay and a massive increase in budget and effects to successfully convey. But the filmmakers tried their best to depict this in the film's original version. How was it received? Critics and audiences alike doubled up with laughter when the watcher was revealed at the end of the film. This obviously didn't sit well with Disney. They pulled the original version of the film from theaters after just 11 days of it playing and replaced it with a re-release of Mary Poppins (!) instead. The film's conclusion was then rewritten (a crew member said that over 150 different endings were penned!) before a suitable ending was agreed upon and reshot, but not using the original director John Hough but the uncredited Vincent McEveety instead. This new final scene is the ending that exists today and is a lot more simplistic and in keeping with the rest of the film. There is no big reveal and it works so much better for that reason. Sometimes in a horror film, mystery is better than a flawed reveal resplendent with a complicated backstory ten minutes before the movie is due to end. However, this original ending does exist and can still be seen. The amended version of the Watcher in the Woods was released the following year in 1981. The Watcher in the Woods is a peach of a movie. Classic haunted house/haunted surroundings tropes are handled by a great director and with an all-star cast. The events of the film never feel cliched or hackneyed. Grand Dame Bette Davis gives a truly great performance. Watch the scene where she meets Jan for the first time and utters the following in inimitable Bette Davis fashion- 'Are you a sensitive girl? Do you sense things?!' all in close up. It chills to the marrow whilst making you think 'They don't make actresses like that anymore!'. The scenes of her with Kyle Richards in which we see that she's not so sinister after all are beautiful to behold. In fact, Ms Davis insisted that she could play the scenes of her character as a younger woman in the film. However this didn't work after make-up tests were carried out and she just didn't look 30 years younger. When the director said that she just didn't look convincing enough Bette looked in the mirror and quipped 'You're Goddamned right!' Another actress was employed to depict the character three decades before. There was much derision of the choice of Lynn Holly Johnson for the part of Jan as she was more famous at that time for her ice-skating endeavours than for acting. But she brings a dewy-eyed innocence to the role as the young teen who is still very innocent and naive, even a little aloof. She was perfect for the role. Diane Lane was meant to have been cast in the part as was reported in The Hollywood Reported when the film was announced but Lynn was cast instead.  I honestly think The Watcher in the Woods is a classic horror film. A brave move for Disney that paid off, even if it took a rethink and a reshoot to fully realise it's potential. If only they had done this before it's release a few red faces at Disney could have been spared.

A really good horror film!

Very oddball, and a bit creepy in parts. Seeing this when I was younger, it was a good movie and it still holds up. Some clever ideas come full tilt at us without much time to breathe. Clocking in at eighty-three minutes it has a lot to cover with good ideas. As much as I do like it, it kind of has a soft spot for me when I watch it today. It seems too kid-friendly in performances. They should've went all out and made it terrifying. I'm glad they went ahead and ended it the way they did, I saw the original ending and it was entirely dumb. But as a movie in time for Halloween. I think this is a good one to show to your kids.

A good suspenseful Disney movie. The film has good little mystery and some good scare moments. The direction is adequate and acting overall decent enough. A better movie then given credit for.

I saw this last when I was 14 years old, I'm now 48. I still remember this as being a GREAT scary movie. And I WAS scared. Good one for teens.