| Original Score: C+ | Sep 7, 2011

It's hard to imagine anyone walking out of this movie satisfied, regardless of Hackman's and Freeman's solid performances.

| Original Score: C- | May 17, 2009

Full Review | Original Score: 3/5 | Dec 23, 2006

Full Review | Original Score: 2/5 | Jul 6, 2005

A powerhouse.....the acting will knock your socks off!

Full Review | Original Score: 3/5 | May 6, 2005

The cast makes it watchable, which is good because little else does.

Full Review | Original Score: 3/5 | Apr 3, 2005

Full Review | Original Score: 2/5 | Nov 26, 2003

| Original Score: 1.5/4 | Aug 30, 2003

...at nearly two hours, it's just too much of a good thing.

| Original Score: 2/4 | Aug 1, 2003

Too tawdry to be completely entertaining, and too static to generate much excitement.

| May 1, 2003

Gene Hackman and Morgan Freeman can't save "Whodunit?" from becoming "Who cares?"

| Original Score: 2/5 | Nov 7, 2002

| Original Score: 3/5 | Oct 30, 2002

| Original Score: 2/4 | Nov 27, 2001

Under Suspicion works less as an absorbing story than an absorbing work of craftsmanship.

| Original Score: B | Oct 24, 2001

Full Review | Original Score: 3/5 | Aug 30, 2001

| Original Score: 3/5 | Jul 3, 2001

Hackman and Freeman will pin you to your seat.

Full Review | May 8, 2001

Full Review | Original Score: B | Apr 23, 2001

Why was Hopkins, the best of whose films is ordinary, hired to construct a film which hangs on psychology and dialogue?

| Original Score: 2/5 | Apr 16, 2001

| Original Score: 70/100 | Feb 13, 2001