...a continuously larger-than-life comedy that’s rarely, if ever, as engaging or charming as one might’ve anticipated...

| Original Score: 2/4 | Feb 6, 2025

A valueless sequel to the valueless 1987 comedy Mannequin and similarly targeted at those who like their women blank, passive and none too bright.

| Dec 14, 2024

Unfortunately, the recycled plot is still the driving force here, and the movie becomes increasingly frantic trying to accommodate it. In the end, Raffill can't bring this dummy to life, but he does try.

| Original Score: 1.5/4 | Jul 15, 2014

Sometimes talented filmmakers can pep up even the most hackneyed material with an infusion of energy and talent.

| Original Score: 3/4 | Jul 15, 2014

The script is so full of old gags it must have been chiselled on stone tablets, while Stewart Raffill's direction is a model example of how not to let the action get in the way of product placements.

| Original Score: 1/5 | Jul 15, 2014

Despite the presence of four credited screenwriters, the plot is a rehash of cliches and tired jokes.

| Original Score: 2/5 | Jul 15, 2014

Could somebody please tell me why four scriptwriters were needed for Mannequin Two: On the Move?

| Jul 15, 2014

Beneath this slick variation on the Sleeping Beauty theme lies a male fantasy that would not withstand much hard psychological scrutiny.

| Original Score: 1.5/4 | Jul 15, 2014

From start to finish Mannequin Two: On the Move is insipid in the extreme.

| Jul 15, 2014

The plot is the same, only dumber.

| Jun 5, 2013

It took four writers to struggle with another idea of why a mannequin would come to life in a department store and what would happen if she did.

| Mar 26, 2009

It's as woefully incompetent as its predecessor, except it's dealing with a smaller budget, you know, for added dreadfulness.

| Original Score: 1/5 | Apr 30, 2008

Raffill's heavy-handed direction is jam-packed with product placement, and interrupted every ten seconds with yet another plug for a boring MOR rock song.

| Feb 9, 2006

Full Review | Original Score: 2/5 | Oct 13, 2005

Full Review | Original Score: 0/5 | Mar 26, 2005

The first one was so-so. This one is less so.

Full Review | Original Score: 2/5 | Aug 24, 2003

Full Review | Original Score: 1/5 | Aug 22, 2003

Full Review | Original Score: 0/5 | Jun 19, 2003

This film has enough new characters and independent spirit to have a light, cheery style of its own.

Full Review | May 20, 2003

Full Review | Original Score: 1/5 | Oct 30, 2002