No Man's Land Reviews
absurd situation creates lasting images that don't diminish with time
| Original Score: B | Jun 17, 2011
A brilliant and brilliantly disturbing film.
| Original Score: 5/5 | Feb 28, 2007
| Original Score: 4/5 | Dec 30, 2006
| Original Score: 4/5 | Dec 6, 2005
| Original Score: 4/5 | Dec 6, 2005
Tanovic adroitly indicts the entrenched hostilities between people and nations.
| Original Score: 3/4 | Jun 25, 2004
| Original Score: 4/5 | Jan 13, 2004
Full Review | Original Score: 3.5/4 | May 14, 2003
savage whimsy
| Original Score: 5/5 | Apr 5, 2003
An intelligent and expertly-judged microcosm of the inanity of war.
| Original Score: 4/5 | Feb 13, 2003
| Original Score: B | Jan 10, 2003
| Original Score: 4/5 | Dec 8, 2002
| Original Score: 5/5 | Oct 30, 2002
Full Review | Original Score: 4/5 | Oct 10, 2002
| Original Score: A- | Sep 18, 2002
Despite some missteps, No Man's Land is a shrewd film that provides a persuasive picture of how small conflicts can escalate into all-out war.
| Sep 9, 2002
Skimps on character development for such a politically-charged movie
| Original Score: C+ | Jun 14, 2002
It's less about battlefields and weaponry than it is about personality conflicts and the agonizing frustration that boils inside people who want to put positive changes into effect, but are too entangled in red tape to do much of anything.
| Jun 10, 2002
No Man's Land is the superior version of Russell's slightly overrated Three Kings.
| May 31, 2002
Makes us laugh and frustrates us at the same time.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/4 | May 21, 2002