Somehow manages to be even lousier than the second film.

| Original Score: 1/4 | Aug 14, 2023

Remarkably redundant yet still highly entertaining.

| Original Score: 7/10 | Nov 27, 2020

By the third time around, though, we know that these two get along and it's just not as funny anymore.

| Original Score: 2.0/4.0 | Sep 21, 2020

Full Review | Original Score: 1/5 | Nov 18, 2011

I hate to use the phrase, "they're only in it for the money," but if any sequel ever exemplified that ethos, it's this one. Ultimately, Rush Hour 3 is a one trick pony whose day has long since passed.

| Original Score: 4/10 | Apr 25, 2011

I have never thought I would ever profess to be a Jackie Chan fan. Yet, at the ripe old age of 31 having just seen Rush Hour 3, it appears that I am.

| Original Score: 7/10 | Aug 26, 2008

| Original Score: 2/5 | Aug 7, 2008

No matter how fast Chris Tucker shoots his mouth or Jackie Chan flashes his fists, they can't recapture the charm of the original Rush Hour in this third installment.

Full Review | Jul 23, 2008

The film is formulaic and the plot is barely connected together. But it moves along quickly and there's the occasional smile.

| Original Score: 4/10 | Mar 3, 2008

Rush Hour 3 is a stagnate yet still commercially viable franchise. It arrives on your theater screen infested with the mold of a dated, stale rehash.

| Original Score: 3/10 | Feb 28, 2008

This Rush job should put the franchise down for good.

| Original Score: 2/4 | Jan 22, 2008

Tucker is the film's 50,000-watt mood killer, determined to fray the nerves of anyone in the theater

Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/4 | Oct 29, 2007

| Original Score: 1.5/4 | Oct 20, 2007

Yvan Attal steals what is otherwise an exhausted, workaday film.

| Original Score: 2/5 | Sep 26, 2007

When the outakes are the best part of a film, you know something's seriously backward. Here's Rush Hour 3 succinctly described in one word: Meh.

Full Review | Original Score: 2/5 | Sep 21, 2007

It is exactly what the trailer promises, providing a reasonably affordable getaway with no hassles. Fans will love it. What a rush!

Full Review | Original Score: 3/5 | Sep 13, 2007

Proves that $25 million does not buy a good, or even bearable performance.

| Original Score: 2/10 | Sep 12, 2007

Three years later in the sequel, Tucker and Chan had found their groove, even if the movie did not have as many good laughs and great stunt work. Now, though, it is an awkward Greatest Hits Reunion Show, and neither one of them seem up to the task

Full Review | Sep 7, 2007

Some things aren't worth doing twice, let alone three times.

Full Review | Original Score: 2/4 | Aug 29, 2007

...the results are pretty much the same old familiar ruckus {but] the pedestrian storyline is somewhat rejuvenated because Chan and Tucker administers the playful punches.

Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4 | Aug 29, 2007