Rotten Tomatoes
Cancel Movies Tv shows

Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey Reviews

No one exactly expects nuance from a slasher, but this film is criminally lazy and misogynistic… worst of all: Tigger erasure.

| Original Score: 1/5 | Dec 11, 2024

Unfortunately, Blood and Honey needed more than just names to hold it all together, because all it is is a subpar slasher film with a killer in a Winnie the Pooh mask.

| Nov 27, 2024

It’s unfair and uninspiring to say what can and can’t be done with a certain IP ... With that said, Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey is unfortunately not good.

| Original Score: 2.5/5 | Nov 20, 2024

This was a hard watch. They didn't even use the intellectual property in a fun way.

| Original Score: 1/5 | Oct 23, 2024

This was painfully dull, cruel, and unnecessary. I haven't been this miserable watching a horror film in a long time.

| Original Score: 1/5 | Oct 23, 2024

This cheap, inartful British exploitation flick offers no subversive take on A.A. Milne’s classic characters and gives no new angles on threadbare horror tropes. Instead, we get a cookie-cutter slasher flick and two corny, unstoppable killing machines

| Feb 22, 2024

This slasher has the blood and gore, but it lacks the most rudimentary character basics and passable mask work to rise above its notorious premise.

| Original Score: 1.5/4 | Nov 3, 2023

Makes you wish the Supreme Court would repeal its public domain copyright laws.

| Oct 6, 2023

I'm down for Winnie & Piglet to be killers but not if it lacks creativity.

| Aug 16, 2023

Sure the idea of the inhabitants of the Hundred Acre Wood going rogue might have sounded kinda fun, but this ghoulish, witless, ill-conceived and terribly executed effort is truly a nightmarish watch.

| Original Score: 0.5/5 | Apr 19, 2023

All of this makes up the film’s paltry opening minutes, rendered in somewhat decent animation. Had [the film] kept that tone and quality up throughout the rest of its runtime, the result would have at least been bearable, even if a little lackadaisical.

| Apr 3, 2023

There aren't any copyright issues with the material but [Rhys Frake-Waterfield] has no right to do what he did with it. [Full review in Spanish]

| Original Score: 1/4 | Mar 24, 2023

The horror only rises out of grotesque deaths as if they were slasher museum pieces rather than the construction of a disturbing atmosphere that reveals the sanguine reverse of a childhood experience. [Full review in Spanish]

| Original Score: 1/5 | Mar 23, 2023

Dreadful script and appalling performances.

| Original Score: 1/5 | Mar 16, 2023

et up as a years-later sequel, there's potential in a story about how these lovable creatures have gone feral, but there isn't one scene in this sadistic, misogynistic movie that makes sense even within this warped premise.

| Original Score: 1.5/5 | Mar 15, 2023

No one would expect intellectual depth from a horror movie spoofing Winnie-the-Pooh, but this really is a film of very little brain.

| Original Score: 1/5 | Mar 13, 2023

This pooh stinks, sure, but it’s not without its charm, finding frustrating moments of wit and levity amidst the punishing cynicism.

| Original Score: 2/5 | Mar 13, 2023

Made on a shoestring budget...and it shoes.

| Original Score: 1/5 | Mar 10, 2023

Rather than being informed by a passion for the original characters, or the desire to tap into their unexplored subtext, it coasts opportunistically on the novelty value of placing them in a gruesome context.

| Mar 10, 2023

Rhys Frake-Waterfield cloddishly desecrates your childhood, and AA Milne’s beloved classic, with a dimly written, shoddily realised, sub-standard slasher whose artistic aspirations never reach beyond making a fast buck.

| Original Score: 1/5 | Mar 10, 2023

Load More