This was a good thriller with a few surprises...Especially since the.main character was a sales man lol....but the story was not good..the Picture quality was good (NOT Dohdoh Certified 💥

"Blood for Dust," directed by Rod Blackhurst, stars Scoot McNairy, Kit Harington, and Josh Lucas in a gritty neo-noir thriller that delves into the dark underbelly of America’s economic despair. The story follows Cliff (McNairy), a struggling salesman, who gets entangled in a dangerous partnership with Ricky (Harington), a charismatic but morally ambiguous figure involved in illicit trade. As the stakes escalate, Cliff is forced to confront his own desperation and moral boundaries. The film explores themes of survival, greed, and the cost of ambition without succumbing to overt melodrama. The performances are the film's strongest asset. Scoot McNairy delivers a nuanced portrayal of a man teetering on the edge of collapse, capturing both vulnerability and quiet resilience. Kit Harington surprises with his menacing charm as Ricky, balancing charisma with unpredictability. Josh Lucas, though underutilized, adds gravitas as a shadowy figure pulling the strings. However, some supporting characters feel one-dimensional, serving more as plot devices than fully realized individuals. Blackhurst’s direction is confident, crafting an atmosphere of tension and unease throughout. The screenplay, co-written by David Ebeltoft, effectively builds suspense but occasionally falters with uneven pacing. While the first act hooks the audience with its grounded setup, the middle section meanders before regaining momentum in the gripping final act. The dialogue walks a fine line between sharp and overly expository, occasionally leaning too heavily on clichés. Cinematography by David Bolen is striking, capturing desolate landscapes that mirror the characters’ internal struggles. The use of muted tones and shadowy lighting enhances the film’s bleak tone while adding visual depth. Editing by Ed Yonaitis is mostly seamless, though some transitions feel abrupt, disrupting the narrative flow. The score by Ariel Marx complements the film’s mood but lacks memorable motifs to elevate key moments. Thematically, "Blood for Dust" examines how financial desperation can erode morality and humanity. It draws parallels to films like "Hell or High Water," though it lacks the same emotional resonance and character depth. Blackhurst’s approach is more subdued, favoring slow-burn tension over explosive drama. While this restraint works in some instances, it occasionally leaves the film feeling emotionally distant. Compared to Blackhurst’s previous work on "Here Alone," this film shows growth in visual storytelling but struggles with similar pacing issues. The narrative ambition is commendable, but it doesn’t always land with the intended impact. The moral dilemmas presented are intriguing but could have been explored more thoroughly to leave a lasting impression. "Blood for Dust" is a solid yet flawed thriller that succeeds in atmosphere and performances but falters in pacing and emotional engagement. It will likely appeal to fans of slow-burn crime dramas but may leave casual viewers wanting more depth or excitement. While not groundbreaking, it’s a commendable effort that showcases Blackhurst’s potential as a filmmaker.

Pretty standard but well executed.

Great effin Fargo like movie!! A pleasure

Kit Harington gives one of his best performance as the main antagonist......however at the end day the overall quality of the film was a slow overly long flick that was saved by the last 30 minutes.

Suplee was good but not in it much. But a movie where bullets are plenty and people die left and right and you don't care at all? Kinda tells you all you need to know. If a viewer feels anything but revulsion for any of these characters, I'd suggest therapy. Lots of therapy.

This was a great throwback to 90's noir cinema. Blackhurst's direction is stylized and atmospheric, while Ebeltoft's screenplay is intricate and evocative. It's an anxious ride of wits as you wait to see who will come out of it alive.

A story of deceit and desperation, trust and commitment and fear and hope, wrapped inside a suspenseful thriller about and guns, drugs and money. Unassuming and lowbrow but rich enough to keep you engaged all the way.

Blood for Dust is slow (some say moody). You are undoubtedly engaged from the start with the struggle and dilema of the main characters, but after a while you lose this will. The thing is just too slow and, importantly, as the plot develops, the story has just one too many significant plot holes, or omissions. If its a rainy day, and you need to mark time, perhaps give this a go, but otherwise it's not a first choice.

A slow burn, only for the patient viewer.

Edge of my seat the entire way. Captures the vast beauty of the mountain west in a while never letting you get too comfortable. 10/10.

Suspenseful, moody and incredibly poignant. All of the performances are raw and powerful!

I saw this film twice. The performances are so subtle and the characters’ developments so intense, you just want to know more and more. Ah, the things we do for love!

Beautifully shot thriller

The phrase “tour-de-force” is tossed around all too lightly these days. That being said this is Harrington’s best work by miles. Fantastic atmosphere and brilliant storytelling. If I could give it more stars I would. You should purchase this film on every platform possible and tell your friends and family to do likewise.

Do yourself a favor and watch this tonight!!

A movie that captures your attention from the first shot! Must-see!

It’s like I forgot what real, gritty film making was like until I saw this movie. If you’re wanting warm and fluffy keep looking. This one is beautifully character driven and gets under the skin.

This film is SO MUCH BETTER than this terrible trailer and key art. It makes no sense why it's being advertised like this when it's an incredible slow burn thriller that's so well crafted. Also, there seems to be some confusion from "critics" who are judging whether or not the film and story needs to exist. That makes no sense. Judge a film on how well it does what it's doing. That's all. Filmmakers don't get to decide which films they get to make - gatekeepers and financiers do. Filmmakers just want to tell stories and create - so they can make a living. Support indie film. Okay, rant over. But seriously, this movie is great. Watch it.

Well-crafted, well-acted, well-edited. Loved the overall mood and story throughout.