Rotten Tomatoes
Cancel Movies Tv shows

Eureka Reviews

While the movie has taut, chilling moments, most of the time it appears to mirror the shell-shocked trauma of its characters.

| Jun 23, 2022

It's a stunning theatrical experience, sorely compromised for home viewing. But even on a small screen with diminished visuals, the film's meticulous sound design makes it a lush and immersive pleasure.

| Aug 28, 2018

| Original Score: 4/5 | Dec 30, 2006

Beautiful film. The length of this may frighten people away but it shouldn't, this suspends time.

| Original Score: 4/5 | Jul 1, 2006

Full Review | Original Score: 3/5 | Dec 28, 2004

Full Review | Original Score: 3/5 | Dec 18, 2004

| Original Score: 3.5/4 | Mar 5, 2002

| Original Score: 4/5 | Oct 29, 2001

Koji Yakusho grounds the film with his emotional truth

| Original Score: B | May 23, 2001

Without question, the film could have been a bit shorter, especially towards the end, but Eureka is a powerful, luxurious study of lives changed in the aftermath of violence.

| May 11, 2001

Aoyama needs to put the editing into other hands.

Full Review | May 11, 2001

Patient viewers will find ample rewards in its 217 minutes of eloquently filmed cinema.

| Original Score: 4/4 | May 7, 2001

Events and characters point in familiar directions, but Eureka is rarely familiar.

| May 7, 2001

This is a film to visually savor.

| Original Score: 3/5 | May 4, 2001

You feel time slipping through your fingers, but, gorgeous and studied to a fault, the film doesn't give you time to look down at your hands.

| May 4, 2001

Its rewards are greater than any bright-and-tight Hollywood movie you've seen so far this year.

| May 4, 2001

Don't let the running time scare you away from the exceptional bit of filmmaking.

Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4 | May 4, 2001

To watch this film, in short, can be a transforming experience.

| Original Score: 4.5/5 | May 4, 2001

The very un-Western style middle- and long-shot camera perspectives favored by Aoyama are quietly apt.

| Original Score: B+ | May 4, 2001

Not always dramatically satisfying but fascinating and mesmerizing to watch.

| May 4, 2001

Load More