Mi dispiace tanto per questo film. Inizialmente era davvero promettente, esilarante e interessante ma poi quando entra in gioco la super donna, la roba delle coppie immortali e bla, bla e bla... Il film fa patatrac

Interesting but no so good at total.

I think the ending was meh

This film need a follow up.. Looking back at all the rubbish films we have seen recently at least this was decent.

I saw it years ago and liked it, so decided to watch it again to pass some time. The effects look quite dated now but it still has some entertaining and funny moments. The first half of the movie is when it works best, then it loses its way and manages to get both silly and serious at the same time. The central idea is a good one though and Hancock deserved a sequel.

Action set pieces is intense, in an era where anything and everything could be a good concept for a superhero movie, Hancock is still a standout for Will Smith in the Block Buster superhero lead role, as well as story beats and solid performances. Some comedy doesn’t land as well, but a drunken Superman who’s lost his place in the world to find it uniquely Though love still shines as a Columbia pictures popcorn hit.

Filme legalzinho, o roteiro é bacana, gostei do will smith como hancock, o começo foi bom, e o filme estava indo bem até a perto do final depois daí o filme não melhorou muito, não colocou um vilão principal no filme. Mas a história do filme até que é interessante, e meio que vale a pena assistir o filme.

First half of the movie is great the second half is terrible. I'm convinced they only wrote a script for the first half and just winged it for the second.

Hancock is funny and pretty fresh but finally gives up on idiosyncrasy, leaving you nothing much to discover.

Will Smith made 'Hancock' in 2008, roughly at the same time when Disney's 'Marvel Shared Universe' began its unprecedented rise to global domination. Superhero movies were still a bit hit and miss, especially ones aimed at adults. Here, everyone's most charming actor plays - effectively - Superman (or at least a superhero of very similar powers), only darker (and drunk!). Apparently, the script went through numerous re-writes to actually get it down to the PG13 rating as it was meant to be R rated. And it shows. It's definitely not a bad film. In fact, it's pretty good. However, not only was it made while superhero movies weren't as mega popular as they are today, but the prospect of a more 'adult-themed' superhero movie was just about as far off as possible (how that would one day change with 'Deadpool' and 'Logan!'). You don't have to be a fan of Will Smith to appreciate this 'darker' take on the genre. It poses the question would the general populous really put up with someone so strong that they can basically do whatever they want without the consequences that the rest of us have to face? Not only that, but someone who causes rampant destruction - even in the name of 'good.' Jason Bateman and Charlize Theron are the main two other stars attached the project and I'm pleased to say that they're not just there to lend their names, but their characters do have significant parts to play in the overall story and make a distraction from this being a Will Smith stand-alone film only. I guess one thing that hasn't held up so well over the years is the CGI used to show Hancock flying around the city (and trashing it!). It all looks very much like it was rendered for a home console and then Will Smith superimposed over the top of it. 'The Avengers' and pretty much any other film that has used mass destruction of a city since 2008 has done these kind of effects better. The other major problem with the film is that it doesn't really have an antagonist. I guess Hancock wrestling the demons of being cursed with these sorts of powers seemed to be enough for the film-makers. It's not a long film (a modest hour and a half) and it felt like the writers suddenly thought that these plot themes might actually not be enough and attempted to throw in a villain at about the hour mark. This doesn't really add that much and probably could have been taken out all together if they didn't feel confident enough to expand this aspect to be an ongoing part of the story. However, those are a couple of minor gripes. Will Smith is as awesome as ever (as are Bateman and Theron - seems unfair to leave them out!) and if you like superhero movies then you should definitely watch this one. It's not as dark and adult as 'Logan' or 'Deadpool,' yet it's certainly not as 'family friendly' as Disney's MCU, but it's still fun. Enjoy.

Hancock's first half is very entertaining, but unfortunately, the script starts to fall apart in the second half, charging ahead like an unfiltered brainstorming session. Nevertheless, Will Smith's personal charm and the superhero-level action scenes, which appeared even before Man of Steel, cannot be denied.

Only enjoy half of the movie. NRJ.

It's an ok superhero movie I guess.

theres nothing wrong with this movie.

it feels good to watch this movie.

this movie is a dark blockbuster, i love it.

more like a zombieland or guns akimbo comedy for people who have a strange sense of humor.

this movie deserves an oscar.

this needs to be a series itself.

better than the scary movie series.