Continue with Google
>
Happily N'Ever After Reviews
Happily N'Ever After only proves that the idea of modernizing the Brothers Grimm for the sake of laughs may have finally jumped the shark.
| Oct 16, 2018
| Original Score: 3/10 | Aug 24, 2010
| Original Score: 3/5 | Aug 23, 2010
| Original Score: D- | Aug 23, 2010
Despite attempts to turn the fairytale genre on its head, the characters are predictable stereotypes.
| Jun 23, 2008
Happily N'Ever After finally arrives, looking like a cheapo knock-off of DreamWorks' ogre.
| Original Score: 1/5 | Aug 3, 2007
Shrek this ain't. A lacklustre effort hampered by limp dialogue and lazy plotting.
| Original Score: 2/5 | Aug 3, 2007
The computerised animation is cut-rate; the script keeps piling on clunker jokes that even toddlers will find lame; and Prinze proves he isn't any better an actor in two dimensions than he is in three.
| Original Score: 1/6 | Aug 1, 2007
Deeply lame.
| Original Score: D | Jun 4, 2007
If you're old enough to read this sentence, you should probably go see something else.
Full Review | Mar 24, 2007
...lives up to the promise of it's title
Full Review | Original Score: 1/4 | Mar 7, 2007
It ain't Shrek, but it ain't dreck.
| Feb 6, 2007
I'll happily never watch it again..
| Original Score: 1/5 | Feb 4, 2007
No child deserves Happily N'Ever After.
| Original Score: 0/5 | Jan 20, 2007
The only real laughs are supplied by the Seven Dwarfs, who are portrayed as hillbilly garden gnomes.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/4 | Jan 15, 2007
With yet again your typical run-of-the-mill animation, Happily N'Ever After seems like another uninspired animated film, however it does have a few positive aspects...
| Original Score: 6/10 | Jan 14, 2007
Tolerable, but far from magical, "Happily N'Ever After" is just another one of what is becoming a genre: Lackluster CGI_animated films.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4 | Jan 14, 2007
It is Shrek-Lite.
| Original Score: 2/4 | Jan 13, 2007
When played with stale jokey-jokes and lame one-liners, as it is here, it's not funny at all.
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/5 | Jan 13, 2007