Hitchcock/Truffaut Reviews
A beautiful view into the genius and art of directing and creating suspense for an era of movies that are unique and timeless.
Thoughtfully enriching and informatively fascinating, this documentary as a companion follow-up to the eponymous book dives into the Hitchcockian significance as an appreciative portrait that marks what you could expect by elemental coverage over his impactful auteurism. (A-)
A wonderfully insightful look into Hitchcock's genius at film as a visual medium, topped with some wonderfully diverse commentaries from the filmmakers of today. Top viewing for those wanting more after initial viewings of some of the great directors most poignant classics. (4/5)
Hitchcock's genius cannot be denied, but man do these directors just pontificate on and on, finding meanings that are just farcical. And then the movie ends with the enigmatic finale that makes you wonder did you just waste 2 hours of your life watching this?
Intercalating perspectives from contemporary directors and priceless audio recordings, this most discerning documentary to complement François Truffaut's 1966 book of the same name is an epitome of Hitchcock hysteria that should satisfy proselytes but offers little novel for his fans.
Film critic Kent Jones wrote and directed this documentary about the making of (and reaction to) the famous book of conversations between director Alfred Hitchcock (then 63) and acolyte and French new wave director Francois Truffaut (then 30). The book runs through Hitch's entire oeuvre with his frank and seemingly unguarded and unpretentious thoughts about each film (originally up until The Birds, 1963, but later updated to include the later films, including Family Plot, 1976, based on further correspondence between the directors). Although this documentary does involve an array of talking heads (David Fincher, Wes Anderson, Olivier Assayas, James Gray, Paul Schrader, Richard Linkater, Peter Bogdanovich, and of course Martin Scorsese), it is really the clips from Hitch's work and the discussion of them that is the highlight. Extended treatment is given to Vertigo and Psycho (and there is an interesting nugget about The Birds) although most films get only a light touch and many none at all. Occasionally we hear recorded excerpts of the actual tapes (including some rather risquà (C) comments that I don't remember in the book!). The take home point is that Truffaut's book helped people to see Hitchcock as an artist who knew how to manipulate audiences with (and even changed) the language of cinema (stemming from his training in the silent days) and also invested many of his personal concerns (and perhaps pathologies) into his films as a true auteur. Although not in the film, a trivia item on imdB.com argues that Truffaut's book (released in 1967) resulted in Hitchcock becoming too self-conscious and therefore never making another good film! (It's an interesting hypothesis but I reckon Frenzy and Family Plot are not too bad). Although I myself would have enjoyed a deeper analysis of each film (with clips), I guess I always have the book to turn to, sitting proudly on my cinema shelf. Still a fun watch if you are a Hitchcock fan!
It sort of goes into the friendship of Hitchcock and Truffaut, but it spends most of its time with other filmmakers talking about why Hitchcock was such a genius. A highlight was Martin Scorsese talking about Vertigo and the analysis of why Psycho was revolutionary.
If you are a fan of Alfred Hitchcock it is interesting to listen to him and some great directors break down his movies.
The success of documentary is usually based on how much you already know and how much you learn about the main subject of the film. I knew a bit about Hitchcock, but I never dug deep into his archival footage or books written about him to understand the full psychology of the master of suspense. Hitchcock/Truffaut is a fascinating look into several of Hitch's films, and even some of Truffaut's, even if it is a little too short to call it a full exploration. Director Kent Jones gathers several of Hollywood's greatest filmmakers, including Martin Scorsese, Richard Linklater, Peter Bogdanovich, and David Fincher, to discuss Hitchcock's influence on the art of cinema and some of his most effective features. These commentators are certainly insightful, but you don't get enough from each of them to get full satisfaction. The film is based around a conversation between Hitchcock and Truffaut that took place in 1962. Truffaut, an up and coming filmmaker at the time, provides the viewer (or reader) a glimpse into what it would be like to interview the legendary filmmaker yourself. In many ways, Truffaut gets to ask all the questions any fan of Hitchcock has always wanted to ask. Whether it's addressing his catholic roots, sexual undertones in many of his features, his transition from silent film to talkies, the dreamlike quality to the films, or his iconic use of "god's eye" camera angles, it's all covered. As a film junkie, this type of coverage on one filmmaker is a dream come true. Again, the one thing I think the film could have improved upon was just giving more of everything and spending even more time on his expansive filmography. Spending a good chunk of time on Vertigo and Psycho was definitely needed, but I would love a more in-depth look at plenty of other films of his as well. However, overall, this documentary is a joy to watch, especially considering it's brilliant filmmakers commenting on Hitchcock, who is one of the greatest. 8.5/10
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????...????????????
I enjoyed listening to Alfred Hitchcock's and Francois Truffaut's own voices discuss the finer points of the art of film, sounding more like cinema scholars than in-the-trenches, working directors. I enjoyed watching all the great directors (particularly Bogdanovich, Scorsese, Schrader, Wes Anderson, and Fincher) weigh in with their takes on the films and ideas featured in "Hitchcock/Truffaut." I also enjoyed the carefully selected clips from the Hitchcock canon. What I didn't enjoy in this documentary was Truffaut and all the modern directors trumpeting what a masterpiece "Vertigo" is. In my latest Blu-Ray sit-down with "Vertigo" (three and half years ago) I still did not "get" this film. "Hitchcock/Truffaut" convinced me that the problem lies within me and not in "Vertigo" itself. (Note: in 2012 the British Film Institute's "Sight & Sound" critics' poll replaced my beloved "Citizen Kane" with "Vertigo" as the greatest picture ever made.) So as a direct result of watching "Hitchcock/Truffaut," my goal is to do more homework on "Vertigo,' including re-watching part of this documentary as well as reading the parts of the book "Hitchcock/Truffaut" itself that cover "Vertigo." Perhaps another viewing will be enough to melt through my cinematic blinders so I can finally see what the great film minds of the world have been appreciating all along. I can only hope.
There is little point in arguing whether or not this is worth it - this is a very essential movie history doc that offers detailed views behind two artistic minds along with modern takes on the real star.
Very interesting documentary... if you are a hardcore Hitchcock fan, but certainly not for the Hitchcock novice. If you don't know his films, you will certainly be lost as they offer you no hints to the clips and stories being showcased. So learn your Hitchcock! lol. All that said, however, for a film clearly aimed at die-hards, there isn't really any NEW information offered here that we didn't already know. On top of that, a lot of the filmmakers interviewed are, while successful, very uninteresting to listen to.
This is a fascinating look at Alfred Hitchcock stemming from Francois Truffaut's legendary interviews with him, as well as their correspondence and deep friendship afterwards. The book that Truffaut would write about it became a groundbreaking reference book for filmmakers in 1966, and really opened the world's eyes to the artistry in Hitchcock's films. Despite his fame, Hitchcock was known as more as a popular director, and did not get enough credit for his genius. Truffaut, 33 years younger and acclaimed for his first few films which were viewed as 'artistic', idolized the man, and helped change that. The documentary includes Hitchcock and Truffaut's thoughts about clips from his great films, as well as a few snippets of Truffaut's own brilliant work. Just as importantly, it includes commentary from Martin Scorsese, Wes Anderson, Peter Bogdonavich, David Fincher, and many other American and French directors who were interviewed, providing real insight. Interesting to anyone who loves the art of cinema, and very interesting to those who love Hitchcock.
Another one of those DVD/Blu-Ray Extra style documentaries but that's not to say it isn't worth watching. It's basically an overview of the book (still on my 'to-read' list) and then input from modern day Directors as well as some clips of the original interviews. The insight from the Directors are probably the most interesting aspect of this film. I could happily of just watched Scorsese and Fincher disect Hitchcock's work to be honest. Truffaut's own work is skimmed over but then the book is I believe almost exclusively about Hitch's career so that seems fair enough. Definitely an interesting viewing.
http://cinephilecrocodile.blogspot.co.uk/2016/10/hitchcock-truffaut-dir-kent-jones-2015.html
There's not a huge amount of material on offer from the interviews that took place, however what we do hear is very insightful, but the wider documentary brings a lot of what is said together well, with some decent talking heads to help paint it.