Hotel Reviews
Not entirely successful, but unlike anything you've seen before.
| Original Score: 3/5 | Apr 17, 2019
Its convoluted, highly allegorical story line will put off many. However, it is certainly a fresh and original take on digital cinema, and, for no other reason, it may be appreciated as a film stretching the very form of filmmaking.
| Original Score: B+ | Jun 21, 2007
| Original Score: 3/5 | Dec 30, 2006
| Original Score: 1.5/5 | Dec 6, 2005
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5 | Sep 9, 2005
A crystal-clear example of what happens when actors and filmmakers congregate with too much time on their hands.
| Original Score: 2/5 | Aug 7, 2005
Are you trying to tell me that Salma Hayek actually understood this script and I did not?
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/5 | Aug 6, 2005
it's through its anarchic, try-anything chutzpah that this bizarrely erotic satire succeeds and entertains
Full Review | Original Score: 3.5/5 | Sep 30, 2004
Full Review | Original Score: 4/10 | Jun 4, 2004
Wears out its welcome pretty fast.
Full Review | Oct 3, 2003
Pretentious avant-garde comedy.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4 | Sep 26, 2003
Here's a strange case. Hotel is a movie that works in no conventional sense, and succeeds in several unconventional ones.
| Original Score: 3/4 | Sep 26, 2003
Pretensions permeate Hotel, which, as a movie about movies, is the cinematic equivalent of a humor column in The Hollywood Reporter.
| Original Score: 2/4 | Sep 25, 2003
It's a love-it-or- hate-it proposition.
Full Review | Jul 31, 2003
If you came across Hotel playing on monitors in a museum of contemporary art it would grab your attention for a while, but as a movie, it's too pretentious, too confusing and just too much.
Full Review | Jul 28, 2003
A train wreck of a film whose chaotic, partly improvised story and too-tricky mix of film stocks, image sizes, split-screen effects and color/B&W footage overwhelm some phenomenally beautiful sequences and a memorable performance by Saffron Burroughs.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5 | Jul 25, 2003
There are clever, funny, erotic and visually beautiful moments scattered throughout the film.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4 | Jul 25, 2003
A jumbled, self-indulgent mess with a rash of story lines and a squandered cast.
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/4 | Jul 25, 2003
Figgis cooks up fewer memorable cinematic tricks here than in Time Code, his previous picture, but he still deserves credit for taking more artistic chances than a dozen ordinary directors.
| Original Score: 3/4 | Jul 25, 2003
Mainly there's a lot of rambling, posing and the smell of everyone involved giving in to the worst sort of art-damaged self-indulgence.
| Original Score: F | Jul 25, 2003