This isn't dumb, but it plays out as academically as it sounds, without a shred of true terror and with only the most muted sexual charge. Solemn, portentous and curiously dull, there is simply no chemical charge between Roberts and Malkovich.

| Feb 23, 2018

| Original Score: C- | Sep 7, 2011

Certainly Julia Roberts' strangest role, and she does an OK job.

Full Review | Original Score: 3/5 | Mar 2, 2008

Full Review | Original Score: 1/5 | May 7, 2007

Full Review | Original Score: 1/5 | Jul 19, 2005

Full Review | Original Score: 1/5 | Jan 24, 2005

[Roberts's] acting is of the Melrose Place/Andrew Shue variety, her eyes blank and mouth often agape (not unlike the photo of her used in the print ads).

| Original Score: 1.5/4 | Dec 28, 2004

Full Review | Original Score: 2/5 | Jul 29, 2004

Full Review | Original Score: 1/5 | Jun 4, 2004

Full Review | Original Score: 3/5 | Sep 5, 2003

If nothing else, proves that when you take Julia's lipstick away, much of her appeal goes, too.

Full Review | Original Score: 1/5 | May 25, 2003

Full Review | Original Score: 2/4 | May 20, 2003

Full Review | Original Score: 2/10 | Apr 4, 2003

| Original Score: 3/4 | Mar 27, 2003

Full Review | Original Score: 2/5 | Jan 15, 2003

I have nightmares about being forced to sit through 'Mary Reilly' one more time.

| Jan 12, 2003

Full Review | Original Score: 2/5 | Dec 6, 2002

| Original Score: 8/10 | Aug 29, 2002

Psychological thriller that nibbles at the edges of the theme of sexual repression and its perils.

| Aug 22, 2002

Julia Roberts' performance was justly mocked, but the remainder of the film may be the most faithful version of Jekyll and Hyde ever made.

Full Review | Original Score: 4/5 | Aug 10, 2002