Meeting Gorbachev Reviews
I'm not going to surprise anyone by stating this documentary was made exclusively with westerners in mind. They remember the bringer of freedom, Gorbi the Punished. And the actual country he kneecapped is extraneous, let them eat Pizza Hut, my fellow freedom lovers. Thankfully, Werner doesn't even try to pretend he is being objective. In the first 10 minutes, he states that he loves the man, and it's hard to even be resentful of his bias. And so Mikhail solvently tells bits and pieces of his rise and downfall, seemingly not understanding the questions he is being asked. No, it's not a mistranslation in the subtitles; he sometimes genuinely doesn't understand what is asked of him, such as his response to the Chernobyl question. Ironically, he became the same fossil as Andropov and Chernenko. The personal touches are not that compelling because, once again, you're barely given any actual personality of the man. For an hour he copes, thinking that he had some kind of chance to keep the union, and now we are crying about his wife. With westerners in mind, no Russians are actually interviewed. And no one who actually lived through the decade he helped create has given their assessment of his legacy, you know beyond saying 30 times that he stopped nuclear war. No, we only have Horst Teltschik with a straight face saying that the Russian border full of NATO countries is the safest border they can dream of and they should actually pay attention to Iran and China. A statement that seemed asinine in 2019 and now appears to be straight up schizophrenic for both sides of the border. It begs the question of what kind of documentary it would be in 2022-23.
Gorbachev is the greatest hero of the world in the last centruary. If the great man theory is correct, then he was that person. May he rest in peace.
I hope more people are seeing this considering current events (like me). It paints a very raw picture about how different things would be today if egos were different, and makes you wonder who's fault the war in Ukraine today really is. It's not as cut and dry as one might think. Fantastic documentary about someone who seems largely brushed over by modern history. Must watch.
Very interesting documentary movie... but I'm pretty sure that the one in the movie was not the real Michail Gorbachev.
Yet there is an abysmal difference between the various "Aguirre" or "Fitzcarraldo" and "Gorbachev": this time it is not the defeat of a delirium of omnipotence, of a utopian idealist who crashes against Nature and its indomitable laws, but of a statesman who was demonstrating how the Leninist way to a "human" communism was viable, so much so that the conservative forces dismissed him with a putsch. The "repubblichino" Ezio Mauro plays dumb denying the historical and macroeconomic evidence: the fall of the Wall in '89 was only a consequence of the multiple reforms carried out during his secretariat from 1985 to 1991. Growing up in a kolkhoz, he had learned to increase the purchasing power not by raising incomes, salaries and wages (see Landini and today's false left), but by keeping prices down and therefore the cost of living. The variables to modify the gap between rich and poor are 2, and a left that is truly such acts on the second, not on the first one. (Mauro Lanari)
This documentary is one of the most important historical records of our time. Every school child in the United States (and their parent) should be required to watch. I remember these events and the U.S. press got it all wrong, preferring to elevate Reagan rather than take the opportunity for world peace. Reagan's legacy should be tarnished by this reality check. What a disgusting display of opportunism. The film also reveals the contrast between the humble home life of Gorbachev (as they visit his garden) and the gross opulence that surrounds U.S. politicians.
Gorbachev is fundamentally an interesting character study - raised in the tumult of the Second World War in unremarkable circumstances, gradually rising to prominence on the back of reforms and internal changes, before overseeing one of the world's largest countries dissolve in the midst of substantial internal and external conflict. Too moderate for the conservative nationalists despite the efficacy of his international efforts, too Soviet for the rest of the world to really embrace, undeniably intelligent. But Herzog's attempt to document his rise, the balance of his success and failures, feels too sanitized, as if an old USSR review board had final cut approval. Still, the actual interview footage stands out among the otherwise relatively conventional documentary material, offering an often candid portrayal of a figure who inhabited a unique role in 20th century history. (3/5)
MEETING GORBACHEV is one of very few documentaries that actually falls a little short of my hopes and expectations for the content it provides and its quality. The archival footage used and the interviews do offer sufficient valuable insight, but I do feel the production (particularly the interviews themselves) has no enhancing or engaging elements to make this better than a stock-standard 온라인카지노추천 documentary.
I'm not much into politics, but I'm indeed into Herzog. Here his sits down with the last President of the Soviet Union and have a chat about everything from his childhood, the love of his life and political wins and downers. Interesting guy, and a nice interview but it fails to interest me. One of the guys poorest, recent documentaries for me - but that's mostly a matter of the topic and not the film as a product. Sorry, Herzie, but I still love you. 5.5 out of 10 Presidents.
A candid recollection of Gorbachev's memories and opinions about the Soviet Union. He is one of the few people in the USSR who was legitimately kind-hearted, well-intentioned and wanted what's better for everyone, with or without communism. Given all the horror stories I hear of Russian from my parents, and the current political landscape, the world is lucky that a man like this was given the option to lead a large state when it was an international "superpower".
Even for those of us who see Herzog as too-frequently ridiculously self-important and imposing in his work, Meeting Gorbachev manages to be very moving, very sad, and an important, insightful portrait for generations who will look back at the end of the 20th century in great bewilderment.
Thank god for Werner Herzog this documentary is one of his best. Gorbachev is an intelligent and interesting character to profile and Herzog is the best man to do it.
'Meeting Gorbachev' is Werner Herzog at his most self indulgent. He claims that he needed to conduct the interview because it was at Gorbachev's request, but you can be certain it didn't take much arm twisting. There were questions and moments where the subject is engaged and honest, but more often than not because the last ruler of the Soviet Union doesn't really want open up, this feels like a missed opportunity. Gorbachev is a complex man and this is a surface doc. Final Score: 5.2/10
Touching. Even if you already know this period of History, Herzog will show you the essence of the man, Михаил Сергеевич Горбачёв, and allow to see him as a tragic figure, almost emblematic.
Acclaimed documentarian Werner Herzog co-directs and interviews one of the most important world leaders of the 20th century Mikhail Gorbachev, who offers the viewer a fascinating behind-the scenes look at his tenure as President of the Soviet Union. Vintage film clips enhance the presentation, which may appeal more to those that like historical docs.
Otro impresionante trabajo de Herzog. La entrevista es grandiosa y el material que adjunta para contextualizar la increíble y legendaria labor de Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev es de lo mejor. Cosas que hay que ver en esta vida...
Enjoyed the one on one chat and reflection on history. Video clips (Regan, Thatcher, Kohl) and other interview bits (James Baker, others) added to the story