Mo' Money Reviews
Silly and predictable, Mo' Money still manages to direct some well-aimed barbs at the idiosyncrasies and hypocrisies of mainstream America.
| Oct 11, 2019
While the screenplay weaves in a number of neatly drawn characters, MacDonald's direction fails to give the film an overall coherency.
| Jun 4, 2018
It's a shame. A low down dirty shame. Or maybe I'm thinking of another Wayans family member.
| Original Score: C | Jul 26, 2012
Entertaining enough and funny enough, and cannily includes all the elements that entice popularity. But, perhaps after reaping the rewards for this film, Wayans will put his obvious talents toward a project that isn't about making more money.
| Original Score: 2.5/4 | Aug 11, 2009
Damon Wayans and his younger brother Marlon make a terrific comedy team in Mo' Money.
| Mar 26, 2009
Damon and Marlon are at their best in the opening comic sequences, which allow their chemistry to operate, but their pacing is disrupted by the ensuing formulaic thrills.
| Feb 9, 2006
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5 | Aug 27, 2005
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5 | May 5, 2005
Only managing to come up with routine action, director Macdonald delivers few thrills, and the comedy doesn't last far beyond the first reel.
| Jan 18, 2005
Full Review | Original Score: 0/5 | Apr 8, 2004
Full Review | Original Score: 1/5 | Jan 12, 2004
Click to read review
| Original Score: 2/4 | Jan 1, 2004
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5 | Nov 20, 2003
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5 | Nov 6, 2003
One or two laughs, but hardly worth a rental.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5 | Jul 16, 2003
Some of the humor in Mo' Money has a mean-spirited edge. And only in isolated moments is it as funny as its own title.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/5 | May 20, 2003
Full Review | Original Score: 1/5 | Feb 10, 2003
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5 | Jan 21, 2003
One of Damon Wayan's better offerings. An entertaining combination of action and laughs.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/5 | Sep 18, 2002
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5 | Jul 29, 2002