Rules of Engagement Reviews
| Original Score: 2.5/4 | Mar 22, 2002
This movie is a blunt object -- blunt, but not particularly effective.
Full Review | Jan 1, 2000
Jones and Jackson in uniform absolutely command our respect.
| Jan 1, 2000
The sentiments here are thoroughly semper fi, but the result occasionally works at cross-purposes.
Full Review | Jan 1, 2000
Reconfirms the talent of onetime wunderkind director William Friedkin.
Full Review | Jan 1, 2000
Entertaining.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4 | Jan 1, 2000
The two actors are soldiers of hard-headed substance at attention in a field of milder actors at ease.
| Original Score: B | Jan 1, 2000
It doesn't have the chops or the ambition to wrestle with the questions it raises.
| Original Score: 2.5/5 | Jan 1, 2000
A run-of-the-mill legal thriller that hopes to be a little more.
Full Review | Jan 1, 2000
At its best, Rules Of Engagement is merely bad.
Full Review | Jan 1, 2000
Rules of Engagement never engages us.
Full Review | Jan 1, 2000
A broad and obvious approach to ambiguous material that's virtually all plot mechanics with little nuance or characterization.
Full Review | Jan 1, 2000
What rescues the movie, time and again, is the strength of Jones' and Jackson's performances.
Full Review | Jan 1, 2000
Cruelly drab.
| Jan 1, 2000
| Original Score: 2/5 | Jan 1, 2000
This drama about a massacre in Yemen takes on unexpected interest because the main character, a fiery-eyed Marine combat hero played by Samuel L. Jackson, is presented as a believably flawed man.
| Original Score: 3/4 | Jan 1, 2000
| Original Score: 3/5 | Jan 1, 2000
Nothing can redeem this film's deep immorality.
Full Review | Jan 1, 2000
There is little suspense.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/5 | Jan 1, 2000
What rescues the movie, time and again, is the strength of Jones' and Jackson's performances ... and the capable direction of William Friedkin.
Full Review | Jan 1, 2000