Continue with Google
>
When We Were Kings Reviews
Muhammad Ali is highly overrated… this documentary isnt! It’s amazing! The music is awesome too!
This movie is the kind of sports coverage we take for granted today. It took the filmmakers about twenty years to gather the footage to make the documentary. These days, we have so many video cameras constantly recording content and the convenience of the internet and media distribution. With all that accessible content today, somebody could produce a sports documentary in a few months.
This is a perfect documentary film. A brilliant masterpiece. As a fan of Muhammad Ali, this film was a pleasure to watch over and over and over again. You don’t have to be a fan of Ali, Foreman or boxing to thoroughly enjoy this story of triumph. A true ‘David vs. Goliath’ story that takes place in Africa. The scenes with James Brown & Miles Davis were also beautiful to see. A must see.
This Documentary is the Greatest!
Beautiful!! RIP Muhammad Ali the real life superhero
What a wit! So fit! When I was a little kid, I remember two times my dad called us to gather on the couch in front of the 온라인카지노추천. One was for Elvis in Hawaii. The other was for the Ali-Foreman bout. The price Ali paid to stand by his beliefs. The incredible drive and charisma and curiosity and wisdom. It all comes through here ... and the Foreman you see in this film bears no resemblance to the cheerful guy hawking grills in K-mart. He looks like he wants to murder Ali through the film.
To be clear, you do not need to be a boxing fan to enjoy Leon Gast's documentary When We Were Kings. The primary focus of the film is the legendary ‘Rumble in the Jungle' heavyweight title fight between the confident and charismatic Muhammad Ali and the morose, powerful George Foreman, but the movie is about so much more, including concert footage of James Brown, B.B. King and The Spinners. In addition, When We Were Kings touches on the tyranny of Zaire's (the location of the film) President Mobutu, mysticism, social injustice, and the healing power of music. The documentary also includes insightful commentaries by Norman Mailer and George Plimpton, who were covering the fight as journalists, as well as a few words from Spike Lee. And, for boxing fans, the fight coverage is fantastic. Beautifully paced and shrewdly edited, there is never a dull moment.
For how old this documentary is (preceding Ali's death by 20 years) and how much time had elapsed between its release and its subject matter, this was a wildly entertaining viewing experience. I love George Plimpton & don't believe he's ever had a bad take on anything. I'm a big MMA nerd but have never truly been interested in boxing; I even take some mild offense when boxing matches are referred to as fights as that's just not what they are, but the way the documentary sets up the match as an absolute spectacle and the way one can retrospectively see how much heart it took for each man to do as well as they did, I find myself bending on the beliefs I held before I watched this. I am especially relieved they did so well with this because I watched it as homework in advance of some other movies where Ali is portrayed by others so as to judge how well they did; this doc made doing that much easier than it might have done.
91%. 3/9/21. Clearly an old school doc but very well done. Ali vs foreman in the DRC. Ali was super confident and knew he'd win. But in the dressing room before it was super quiet because his whole camp thought he'd lose. After the second round one reporter said they saw fear in his eye for the first time. But he had a crazy strategy to lean on the ropes and let foreman wear himself out and it worked. Ali TKOed him a few rounds later.
One of the most engrossing documentaries ever made and one of the best
Unquestionably one of the best sports documentaries of all time.
This 1996 Oscar winner for Best Documentary Feature is a nostalgic reminiscence of occurrences leading to the pinnacle of Black Power at Zaire in 1974 where the legendary heavyweight boxing giants, Muhammad Ali and George Foreman, meet for the momentous boxing event of The Rumble in the Jungle.
An insightful look at the event and surrounding events of the Rumble in the Jungle. It looks at the preparation each went through, which was starkly different. Foreman provides insight on the fight in the current day of the documentary.
I have watched this literally 30 to 40 times and never grow tired of it. It is one of the most interesting and compelling documentaries ever, depicting how Ali's personality, philosophy and accomplishments transcended not just America but the entire globe during a time of great change. For those that watched the Ali funeral and wondered just why this person was so historically significant, this documentary may answer some of your questions. A must-see, even if you're not a fan of the sport.
When you're making a film about an iconic figure, it's very easy to get caught up in the mythology of the person in question and lose sight of the real figure at the heart of the story. This becomes all the more impossible when that figure is Muhammad Ali, whose impact on the sport of boxing is matched only by his political reputation. It is impossible to write the history of America without at least devoting a chapter to Ali, but equally we have every right to ask whether he truly deserves the pedestal society has given him - or at least, whether he deserves one quite so tall. When We Were Kings is an admirable attempt to document Ali at the moment of what is arguably his greatest triumph - his comeback against George Foreman in 1974, in what was christened 'the Rumble in the Jungle'. If Entertainment Weekly is to be believed, it took director Leon Gast 22 years to finance, shoot and edit the finished film, which went on to win the Best Documentary Oscar in 1996. But just as Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy is often more interested in guilt and cultural ennui than it is about actual spying, so Gast's film about boxing has less of the sport in it than you may expect, something which is both its most unique quality and its Achilles heel. The first telling sign of Gast's true intentions lies in his choice of contributors. While a more conventional boxing documentary would have interviewed the two pugilists and their close associates (whether they be family, friends, trainers or whatever), Gast's cast of talking heads consists primarily of journalists and other cultural commentators, like filmmaker Spike Lee and The Village Voice co-founder Norman Mailer. By giving us a vicarious experience of the fight and its build-up, Gast is trying to avoid the trap of just letting the main players reiterate their self-aggrandising soundbites, and for the most part it works really well. For people of my age, who grew up with the likes of Senna and the later, better works of Julien Temple, Gast's approach with regard to talking heads may come across as rather old-fashioned. But it avoids being televisual, thanks in part to his shooting style and the way in which he frames his speakers, often putting them in middle distance from the frame to convey a sense of perspective, rather than in an aggressive close-up. Mailer particularly benefits from this stylistic choice; you understand from his body language how passionate he is about his subject matter, to an extent that you would never get just from looking at his face and hearing him talk. What becomes clear very quickly with When We Were Kings is that Gast is just as interested in the culture and politics surrounding the Rumble in the Jungle as he is in the actual fight. Much of the build-up concerns itself with the unstable political climate of Zaire and the unsavoury dictatorship of Mobutu Sese Seke, with Mailer sharing a particularly forthright anecdote about the murder of criminals. Just like 'The Thriller in Manila' a year afterwards, the staging of the Rumble in the Jungle is one of two fighters with varying principles at war with each other against a backdrop of poverty and political corruption; money talked to make the fight happen, but once they enter the ring, their honour is the main thing on the line. The film is also interested in the music of the era, including the cavalcade of musicians which played at the so-called 'Black Woodstock' festival which took place alongside the fight. We get some enjoyable clips of James Brown, B. B. King and others in their respective primes, and it's difficult not to be swept up in the atmosphere of the event. If nothing else, the abundance of this footage, together with the clips of African drummers and dancers, make us feel rooted in the build-up; we soak in our surroundings, and though we are never anything but tourists, we are not manipulated and sold a dummy version of what 1970s Africa was like. The problem with having so much of this footage, entertaining and enjoyable as it doubtless is, is that the film becomes less focussed of the story in favour of wallowing in the atmosphere. Building up a palpable sense of tension in a thriller is a hard thing to do, but once you have it, it has to pay off in a satisfying way, and the same rules apply to documentaries. Having worked really hard to culturally and historically situate the fight, the film takes a surprisingly long time to get to the first punch being thrown, and the more footage of Ali and Foreman that we get before this point, the more restless and itchy we become. When Alfred Hitchcock was interviewed by Dick Cavett in 1972, he expressed regret about a scene in Sabotage in which a young boy carries a bomb onto a bus and is blown up by it. Hitchcock described his decision to let the bomb go off (rather than be found and disposed of) as "a terrible mistake" - not because it involved the death of a child, but because he had put his audience "through the mill" and not given them the relief they needed. While the parallel is far from exact, it reflects the main issue with When We Were Kings; instead of getting to the boxing sooner rather than later - something which newcomers would rationally expect - we get a lot of (albeit pleasant) shoe-leather and not enough analysis of the fight itself. The other effect of situating us so deep within the context of the fight - to the point where it is almost hypnotic - is that we get swept up in the mythology and mystique of Ali without getting an explanation to it. It is edifying to see Ali appealing to the common humanity of Africans and African-Americans, and to see people drawn towards him as a figure. But what we don't get enough of us is the ugly side of Ali - the same person who claimed to unite Africa would also stoop to calling Joe Frazier a gorilla just 12 months later. It may simply be a factor of my background - as a white, lower-middle-class, British male born in the late-1980s - that I will never appreciate the real impact that Ali had within black culture. It's easy to resort to platitudes, particularly since his passing, and given the broad spectrum of people he has influenced, it would be difficult for any one film to convey his legacy. When We Were Kings made the right decision of focussing on one event and using it as a microcosm to analyse the man; however, you leave the experience admiring the man but with niggling doubts as to why you admire him, or whether that admiration is fully deserved. That may be a failure of mine, but it is also a failure of the film for not pulling in complete novices like myself. Once we do actually get to the fight, Gast's talking heads hit their stride and we begin to get the level of technical and critical insight which we had expected all along. Mailer's account of the fight is excellent, from his description of Ali's dressing room ("it was like a morgue") to his analysis of Ali throwing right-hand leads to Foreman, and the connotations therein. The fight footage is framed intelligently and the denouement is fitting; if nothing else, it knocks the re-enactment of the fight from Michael Mann's Ali out of the ring and into a cocked hat. When We Were Kings is an absorbing and intriguing documentary which is dripping with cultural context but sadly a little too light on insight. As a time capsule of the 1970s in general and of this particular era in boxing, the film is little short of brilliant. But as an attempt at deconstruction of a myth - whether Ali's or Foreman's - it doesn't go deep enough, and may leave newcomers to the sport slightly baffled. As an introduction to Ali's mystique, it's definitely worth your time; just don't expect to come out with more answers than questions.
Movie night with Iris. The greatest sports documentary ever FACT. And one of the best documentaries ever. Emotional, inspiring and funky as hell. Say it loud, i'm black and i'm proud.
I was lucky enough to see this in the Thearte. Hoping to watch again if possible.
One of my favorite films