Rotten Tomatoes
Cancel Movies Tv shows

1922 Reviews

In cinemas, it might have been overshadowed by flashier rivals, but perhaps, on demand, this slow, but winningly bleak little tale will find the audience it deserves.

| Original Score: 4/5 | Aug 26, 2019

[1922] is a credible addition to a filmography where practically every thought the writer commits to paper is, seemingly, deemed fit for the screen.

| Oct 20, 2017

The familiar case of a short story stretched too thin in a feature film.

| Original Score: 2/4 | Oct 20, 2017

There's an unshakable menace that lingers, a tale of guilt and regret that burrows its way under the skin.

| Original Score: 3/5 | Oct 19, 2017

Thomas Jane's dramatization of rage is haunting and shrewdly comical in its overt and ultimately moving über-manliness.

| Original Score: 3/4 | Oct 18, 2017

The film is not lurid in its scares, and instead depicts its protagonist's suffering mostly as a slow rot.

| Sep 26, 2017

Bled dry of suspense and true horror, 1922 is a dismal affair. Perhaps Hilditch was aiming for slow-burn horror, but all he mustered was a patience-trying bore.

| Original Score: 1.5/5 | Sep 25, 2017

... it's a reminder that King's biggest strengths lie in his unparalleled ability to build tension, create atmosphere, and tell a direct and brutal story, not in his ability to launch profitable many-branched franchises.

| Sep 25, 2017

It doesn't take any shocking new twists, but musters just enough fresh polish to a classic scenario to make it worth one more ride.

| Original Score: B+ | Sep 25, 2017

Too often actors playing rural roles mistake "slow" for "stupid," but Jane pinpoints Wilfred's mental acuity without rushing through reactions that feel anachronistic or phony.

| Sep 24, 2017

A largely satisfying adaptation of Stephen King's novella about unappeasable guilt triggered by the mortal sin of murder.

| Sep 24, 2017

Load More